From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933727Ab3FSGeU (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:34:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-f176.google.com ([209.85.215.176]:33130 "EHLO mail-ea0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756111Ab3FSGeS (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:34:18 -0400 Message-ID: <1371623653.3252.268.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Subject: Re: [net-next rfc 3/3] tuntap: increase the max queues to 16 From: Eric Dumazet To: Jason Wang Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, hkchu@google.com, mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:34:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1371620452-49349-4-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> References: <1371620452-49349-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <1371620452-49349-4-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 13:40 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Since we've reduce the size of tun_struct and use flex array to allocate netdev > queues, it's safe for us to increase the limit of queues in tuntap. Its already safe to increase max queues to 16, without your patches 1 & 2