All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	john.ronciak@intel.com, miles.j.penner@intel.com,
	bruce.w.allan@intel.com,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] PCI: acpiphp: look _RMV method a bit deeper in the hierarhcy
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:22:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1372177330-28013-6-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372177330-28013-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

The acpiphp driver finds out whether the device is hotpluggable by checking
whether it has _RMV method behind it (and if it returns 1). However, at
least Acer Aspire S5 with Thunderbolt host router has this method placed
behind device called EPUP (endpoint upstream port?) and not directly behind
the root port as can be seen from the ASL code below:

Device (RP05)
{
	...
	Device (HRUP)
	{
		Name (_ADR, Zero)
		Name (_PRW, Package (0x02)
		{
			0x09,
			0x04
		})
		Device (HRDN)
		{
			Name (_ADR, 0x00040000)
			Name (_PRW, Package (0x02)
			{
				0x09,
				0x04
			})
			Device (EPUP)
			{
				Name (_ADR, Zero)
				Method (_RMV, 0, NotSerialized)
				{
					Return (One)
				}
			}
		}
	}

If we want to support such machines we must look for the _RMV method a bit
deeper in the hierarchy. Fix this by changing pcihp_is_ejectable() to check
few more devices down from the root port.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/pci/hotplug/acpi_pcihp.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpi_pcihp.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpi_pcihp.c
index 2a47e82..2760954 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpi_pcihp.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpi_pcihp.c
@@ -408,21 +408,64 @@ got_one:
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_get_hp_hw_control_from_firmware);
 
+static acpi_status pcihp_evaluate_rmv(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl,
+				      void *context, void **return_not_used)
+{
+	unsigned long long *removable = context;
+	unsigned long long value;
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_RMV", NULL, &value);
+	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && value) {
+		*removable = value;
+		return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
+	}
+	return AE_OK;
+}
+
+/*
+ * pcihp_is_removable - check if this device is removable
+ * @handle: ACPI handle of the device
+ * @depth: how deep in the hierarchy we look for the _RMV
+ *
+ * Look for _RMV method behind the device. @depth specifies how deep in the
+ * hierarchy we search.
+ *
+ * Returns %true if the device is removable, %false otherwise.
+ */
+static bool pcihp_is_removable(acpi_handle handle, size_t depth)
+{
+	unsigned long long removable = 0;
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	status = pcihp_evaluate_rmv(handle, 0, &removable, NULL);
+	if ((status == AE_CTRL_TERMINATE) && removable)
+		return true;
+
+	acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, handle, depth, pcihp_evaluate_rmv,
+			    NULL, &removable, NULL);
+	return !!removable;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Some BIOSes, like the one in Acer Aspire S5 places the _RMV method a bit
+ * deeper in the hierarhcy. So check at least 3 levels behind this device.
+ */
+#define PCIHP_RMV_MAX_DEPTH	3
+
 static int pcihp_is_ejectable(acpi_handle handle)
 {
 	acpi_status status;
 	acpi_handle tmp;
-	unsigned long long removable;
+
 	status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_ADR", &tmp);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
 		return 0;
 	status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EJ0", &tmp);
 	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
 		return 1;
-	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_RMV", NULL, &removable);
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && removable)
-		return 1;
-	return 0;
+
+	return pcihp_is_removable(handle, PCIHP_RMV_MAX_DEPTH);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-25 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-25 16:22 [PATCH 0/6] Thunderbolt workarounds take 2 Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] PCI: acpiphp: do not check for SLOT_ENABLED in enable_device() Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 23:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27 13:25     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-28  9:51     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-28 17:00       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-28 18:54         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-01  9:32           ` Mika Westerberg
2013-07-01 14:01             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-01 18:36               ` Mika Westerberg
2013-07-02  1:29                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-02 16:40                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-02 20:29                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-02 20:31                       ` Mika Westerberg
2013-07-02 20:49                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] PCI: acpiphp: enable_device(): rescan even if no new devices on slot Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 23:37   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27 13:02     ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 16:32       ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 16:50         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27 16:54         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27  1:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-27 13:04     ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] PCI: introduce pci_trim_stale_devices() Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 17:47   ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-25 17:56     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-28 19:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] PCI: acpiphp: check for new devices on enabled host Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 18:04   ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-26  9:39     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-27 19:05   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-28  9:33     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-28 16:22       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-28 20:04         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-25 16:22 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2013-06-25 18:15   ` [PATCH 5/6] PCI: acpiphp: look _RMV method a bit deeper in the hierarhcy Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-25 18:31     ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 18:31       ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-25 18:51         ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 19:30           ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-07-02 10:44   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-07-02 17:09     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-02 17:45       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-07-02 20:48         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-02 20:40       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/PCI: quirk Thunderbolt PCI-to-PCI bridges Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 21:15   ` Jesse Barnes
2013-06-26 12:17     ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 15:04       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-06-26 20:59       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-26 22:15         ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-27 13:09           ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 22:18   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-26 22:26     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-26 22:31       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-26 22:44         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-26 22:38           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-26 22:55         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-26 23:56           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-27 16:00             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27 17:27               ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-27 13:58       ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 13:54     ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 16:27       ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 17:18         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-25 23:24 ` [PATCH 0/6] Thunderbolt workarounds take 2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-26  7:25   ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 12:45     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-26 19:48       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-26 20:01         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-26 19:55           ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1372177330-28013-6-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miles.j.penner@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.