From: Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] nss: add version 3.15.1
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:34:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1373542459.2389.323.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0La1Npg5YwJ8ihzfbZvepOvg2HdjkbK_ir6WOvBVHBBkcQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 12:14 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 11 July 2013 11:45, Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net> wrote:
> > I think you could still legitimately question whether having recipes in
> > oe-core that are "just for LSB" is sensible and/or desirable, not least
> > because dangling libraries that don't have any users are hard to test.
>
> I was just pondering the idea of a "meta-lsb"...
Yeah, I was thinking about that too. The obvious downside of this plan
is that this layer would end up containing a random-looking grab-bag of
recipes with nothing in common other than that they're needed for LSB
conformance and not in oe-core.
In practice that's probably going to mean that the majority of them
would duplicate recipes from other layers (e.g. meta-browser in the nss
case) which doesn't seem like a very satisfactory state of affairs.
p.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-11 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-10 8:03 [PATCH V2 0/5] add nss for LSB library check Hongxu Jia
2013-07-10 8:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] nspr: add native version Hongxu Jia
2013-07-10 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] packagegroup-core-lsb: add nss for LSB library check Hongxu Jia
2013-07-10 8:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] nss: add version 3.15.1 Hongxu Jia
2013-07-11 10:40 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-11 10:41 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-11 10:45 ` Phil Blundell
2013-07-11 11:14 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-11 11:27 ` Hongxu Jia
2013-07-11 11:34 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2013-07-11 13:41 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-10 8:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] nss: create checksum files for the nss libraries Hongxu Jia
2013-07-12 12:39 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-12 12:45 ` Hongxu Jia
2013-07-10 8:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] nss: fix incorrect shebang line of perl script Hongxu Jia
2013-07-11 8:39 ` Trevor Woerner
2013-07-11 8:58 ` Hongxu Jia
2013-07-11 9:23 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-07-11 9:28 ` Hongxu Jia
2013-07-11 12:04 ` [PATCH V3 0/5] add nss for LSB library check (cover letter only) Hongxu Jia
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-09 12:30 [PATCH 0/5]add nss for LSB library check Hongxu Jia
2013-07-09 12:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] nss: add version 3.15.1 Hongxu Jia
2013-07-09 12:44 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-07-09 13:29 ` Hongxu Jia
2013-07-09 13:38 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-07-09 13:41 ` Khem Raj
2013-07-10 1:26 ` Hongxu Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1373542459.2389.323.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign \
--to=pb@pbcl.net \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.