From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6FCF2C00E4 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:19:46 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1373840376.19894.274.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: ABI defined register usage within function calls From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: JiveTalkin Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:19:36 +1000 In-Reply-To: <1373629119047-73669.post@n7.nabble.com> References: <1373464479578-73565.post@n7.nabble.com> <1373629119047-73669.post@n7.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 04:38 -0700, JiveTalkin wrote: > Moderator..can you change the subject of this to "Understanding register > usage as per ABI rules for functions" ?? > > Additionally, doesn't anyone have anything to say about this? We don't modify subjects after the fact. As to why nobody replied, well, I suppose the 2 or 3 people who actually understand that stuff were all too busy or didn't notice :-) I'll try to reply later today if I get a chance or you can try to catch me on IRC (freenode/#mklinux) Cheers, Ben. > -- > View this message in context: http://linuxppc.10917.n7.nabble.com/ABI-defined-register-usage-within-function-calls-tp73565p73669.html > Sent from the linuxppc-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev