From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932215Ab3HMVKN (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:10:13 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:52783 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932141Ab3HMVKK (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:10:10 -0400 Message-ID: <1376428169.4255.16.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] DT/core: cpu_ofnode updates for v3.12 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Rob Herring , Sudeep KarkadaNagesha , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , linuxppc-dev , Viresh Kumar , Olof Johansson , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:09:29 +1000 In-Reply-To: <1974929.8mIZF44QnT@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <5208E2D3.7060005@arm.com> <520A536C.3030600@arm.com> <1974929.8mIZF44QnT@vostro.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 21:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I'd go for 1 above personally. Yuck no. Two functions with roughly the same name and the same purpose differing only by an underscore just because one can't take 5mn to reconcile the new one with the old one ? No way. Ben. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] DT/core: cpu_ofnode updates for v3.12 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:09:29 +1000 Message-ID: <1376428169.4255.16.camel@pasglop> References: <5208E2D3.7060005@arm.com> <520A536C.3030600@arm.com> <1974929.8mIZF44QnT@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1974929.8mIZF44QnT@vostro.rjw.lan> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Sudeep KarkadaNagesha , Viresh Kumar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 21:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I'd go for 1 above personally. Yuck no. Two functions with roughly the same name and the same purpose differing only by an underscore just because one can't take 5mn to reconcile the new one with the old one ? No way. Ben. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A5BB2C0173 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:10:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1376428169.4255.16.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] DT/core: cpu_ofnode updates for v3.12 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:09:29 +1000 In-Reply-To: <1974929.8mIZF44QnT@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <5208E2D3.7060005@arm.com> <520A536C.3030600@arm.com> <1974929.8mIZF44QnT@vostro.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Sudeep KarkadaNagesha , Viresh Kumar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , Rob Herring , Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 21:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I'd go for 1 above personally. Yuck no. Two functions with roughly the same name and the same purpose differing only by an underscore just because one can't take 5mn to reconcile the new one with the old one ? No way. Ben. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: benh@kernel.crashing.org (Benjamin Herrenschmidt) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:09:29 +1000 Subject: [GIT PULL] DT/core: cpu_ofnode updates for v3.12 In-Reply-To: <1974929.8mIZF44QnT@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <5208E2D3.7060005@arm.com> <520A536C.3030600@arm.com> <1974929.8mIZF44QnT@vostro.rjw.lan> Message-ID: <1376428169.4255.16.camel@pasglop> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 21:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I'd go for 1 above personally. Yuck no. Two functions with roughly the same name and the same purpose differing only by an underscore just because one can't take 5mn to reconcile the new one with the old one ? No way. Ben.