On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 14:09 -0600, jerry.hoemann@hp.com wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 07:50:15PM -0400, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > kexec permits the loading and execution of arbitrary code in ring 0, which > > is something that module signing enforcement is meant to prevent. It makes > > sense to disable kexec in this situation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett > > > Matthew, > > Disabling kexec will disable kdump, correct? Yes. > Are there plans to enable kdump on a system where secure > boot is enabled? Yes, Vivek Goyal (cc:ed) is working on that. -- Matthew Garrett {.n++%ݶw{.n+{G{ayʇڙ,jfhz_(階ݢj"mG?&~iOzv^m ?I