All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] scsi: support packing multi-segment in UNMAP command
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 09:34:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <138141eb-6bb9-88bc-cdb0-85f6df8b18cb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220521113259.3953757-1-chao@kernel.org>

Ping,

Any comments?

Thanks,

On 2022/5/21 19:32, Chao Yu wrote:
> As SPEC describes that it can support unmapping one or more LBA range
> in single UNMAP command, however, previously we only pack one LBA
> range in UNMAP command by default no matter device gives the block
> limits that says it can support in-batch UNMAP.
> 
> This patch tries to set max_discard_segments config according to block
> limits of device, and supports in-batch UNMAP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/sd.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>   drivers/scsi/sd.h |  1 +
>   2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index dc6e55761fd1..be070457c78d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -790,6 +790,7 @@ static void sd_config_discard(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned int mode)
>   	q->limits.discard_granularity =
>   		max(sdkp->physical_block_size,
>   		    sdkp->unmap_granularity * logical_block_size);
> +	blk_queue_max_discard_segments(q, sdkp->max_block_desc_count);
>   	sdkp->provisioning_mode = mode;
>   
>   	switch (mode) {
> @@ -837,10 +838,10 @@ static blk_status_t sd_setup_unmap_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>   {
>   	struct scsi_device *sdp = cmd->device;
>   	struct request *rq = scsi_cmd_to_rq(cmd);
> +	struct bio *bio;
>   	struct scsi_disk *sdkp = scsi_disk(rq->q->disk);
> -	u64 lba = sectors_to_logical(sdp, blk_rq_pos(rq));
> -	u32 nr_blocks = sectors_to_logical(sdp, blk_rq_sectors(rq));
> -	unsigned int data_len = 24;
> +	unsigned short segments = blk_rq_nr_discard_segments(rq);
> +	unsigned int data_len = 8 + 16 * segments, i = 0;
>   	char *buf;
>   
>   	rq->special_vec.bv_page = mempool_alloc(sd_page_pool, GFP_ATOMIC);
> @@ -853,13 +854,20 @@ static blk_status_t sd_setup_unmap_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>   
>   	cmd->cmd_len = 10;
>   	cmd->cmnd[0] = UNMAP;
> -	cmd->cmnd[8] = 24;
> +	cmd->cmnd[8] = data_len;
>   
>   	buf = bvec_virt(&rq->special_vec);
> -	put_unaligned_be16(6 + 16, &buf[0]);
> -	put_unaligned_be16(16, &buf[2]);
> -	put_unaligned_be64(lba, &buf[8]);
> -	put_unaligned_be32(nr_blocks, &buf[16]);
> +	put_unaligned_be16(6 + 16 * segments, &buf[0]);
> +	put_unaligned_be16(16 * segments, &buf[2]);
> +
> +	__rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq) {
> +		u64 lba = sectors_to_logical(sdp, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> +		u32 nr_blocks = sectors_to_logical(sdp, bio_sectors(bio));
> +
> +		put_unaligned_be64(lba, &buf[8 + 16 * i]);
> +		put_unaligned_be32(nr_blocks, &buf[8 + 16 * i + 8]);
> +		i++;
> +	}
>   
>   	cmd->allowed = sdkp->max_retries;
>   	cmd->transfersize = data_len;
> @@ -2859,7 +2867,7 @@ static void sd_read_block_limits(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
>   	sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks = get_unaligned_be32(&buffer[12]);
>   
>   	if (buffer[3] == 0x3c) {
> -		unsigned int lba_count, desc_count;
> +		unsigned int lba_count;
>   
>   		sdkp->max_ws_blocks = (u32)get_unaligned_be64(&buffer[36]);
>   
> @@ -2867,9 +2875,9 @@ static void sd_read_block_limits(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
>   			goto out;
>   
>   		lba_count = get_unaligned_be32(&buffer[20]);
> -		desc_count = get_unaligned_be32(&buffer[24]);
> +		sdkp->max_block_desc_count = get_unaligned_be32(&buffer[24]);
>   
> -		if (lba_count && desc_count)
> +		if (lba_count && sdkp->max_block_desc_count)
>   			sdkp->max_unmap_blocks = lba_count;
>   
>   		sdkp->unmap_granularity = get_unaligned_be32(&buffer[28]);
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.h b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> index 0a33a4b68ffb..e396bcaf76ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ struct scsi_disk {
>   	u32		opt_xfer_blocks;
>   	u32		max_ws_blocks;
>   	u32		max_unmap_blocks;
> +	u32		max_block_desc_count;
>   	u32		unmap_granularity;
>   	u32		unmap_alignment;
>   	u32		index;

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-25  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-21 11:32 [RFC PATCH] scsi: support packing multi-segment in UNMAP command Chao Yu
2022-05-25  1:34 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2022-05-25  1:42   ` Martin K. Petersen
2022-05-25  1:58     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=138141eb-6bb9-88bc-cdb0-85f6df8b18cb@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.