On mar, 2013-11-19 at 14:56 +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> The relevant bits in dummy_numa_init are in the error path of
> xen_numa_init().
> 
> I do think this approach (using the provided API to setup the single
> (dummy) node), is preferable to calling dummy_numa_init().
> 
> If I thought the hypervisor ABI was finalized, I'd be happy with this
> series as-is -- the remaining issues are superficial.
> 
So, David, in this regard, what do you think about these (and the
following messages in the thread?

http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3C528B7D350200007800104840@nat28.tlf.novell.com%3E
http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3C1384871712.19880.90.camel@Abyss%3E
http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3C528B885702000078001048CF@nat28.tlf.novell.com%3E
http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3C1384875772.15360.6.camel@Solace%3E
http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3C528B97C502000078001049AE@nat28.tlf.novell.com%3E

I think Jan has a point about how we are right now retrieving and
treating the number of vnodes...

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)