From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] interrupt handling fixes
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:22:09 +0000
Message-ID: <1386688929.30568.36.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312101302200.7093@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312101302200.7093@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 13:05 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi all,
> this series is a reworked version of "Fix multiple issues with the
> interrupts on ARM":

#1 and #4-#6 are acked they seem comparatively straight forward does it
make sense to apply those now without the other two? Is it safe to do
so?

Ian.