From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] Build OVMF for Xen-unstable Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:47:58 +0000 Message-ID: <1386697678.30568.67.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> References: <1386695976-24340-1-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> <1386695976-24340-3-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> <21159.20142.184300.317319@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20131210173820.GO32155@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131210173820.GO32155@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu Cc: George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 17:38 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 05:26:06PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Wei Liu writes ("[PATCH RFC 2/5] Build OVMF for Xen-unstable"): > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu > > > > This looks plausible. Is there some reason it shouldn't go in right > > away, to arrange that ovmf is build-tested ? > > > > I think it is OK to arrange this to go in right away. This has some subset of the same risks as the patch to enable it by default (i.e. it causes grief in the push gate) -- it might be wise at this stage of the release to involve George in these sorts of decisions for osstest? > > Wei. > > > Acked-by: Ian Jackson > > > > Thanks, > > Ian.