From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [libvirt] Setting devid for emulated NICs (Xen 4.3.1 / libvirt 1.2.0) using libxl driver Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:11:02 +0000 Message-ID: <1387534262.17289.34.camel__15000.2422779382$1387534376$gmane$org@kazak.uk.xensource.com> References: <52B07D09.5060008@canonical.com> <1387299534.1025.19.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <52B08AA9.8010809@canonical.com> <1387369646.27441.129.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <52B19F4E.8010601@canonical.com> <1387373284.28680.18.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <52B1B842.4090306@canonical.com> <52B2415A.3030903@suse.com> <1387448340.9925.30.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <52B3278D.3000607@canonical.com> <52B33D6C.6010608@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <52B33D6C.6010608@suse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jim Fehlig Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, Stefan Bader , Xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 11:39 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Stefan Bader wrote: > > Oh, just while talking about setdefault. Jim, this is one of the odd things when > > moving from xm to xl stack from libvirt: libvirt defaults to the netfront NIC > > when no model is specified and sets the type. The libxl setdefault function sets > > the model to rtl8139 but leaves the type untouched. > > The xend toolstack always creates both emulated and vif devices unless > 'type=netfront' is explicitly specified. As you say, the guest gets to > choose what to do with them. E.g. PXE boot using the emulated device, > or have the driver for the PV device unplug the emulated one. I don't > think libxl supports this right? It should do, in fact I thought it was the default. How are you initialising the libxl_device_nic? Type == VIF_IOEMU (which is the default for a VIF on an HVM guest) means both emulated and pv. (there were bugs in the semantics here in very early versions of libxl, but I thought they were fixed even before 4.2) I don't think there is an option to have just the emulated device -- there is always a PV VIF there even if the guest doesn't use it. Ian.