From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pawel.moll@arm.com (Pawel Moll) Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 16:19:54 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: integrator: multiplatform advancements In-Reply-To: References: <1392373771-17303-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20140214134756.GI30257@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <1394036394.4160.12.camel@hornet> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 09:37 +0000, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:29:25AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> The *real* solution, one might argue is to convert the CLCD > >> driver to DRM and add device tree bindings, but it appears that > >> this is an orthogonal goal that has been attempted by other with > >> mixed results. > > > > What mixed results? You know, I find it rather sick that people run > > around trying to do this to a driver that I authored and maintain > > without one comment to me about it. It sometimes feels like people > > think I don't exist anymore. > > Sorry, I was referring to this driver for PL111: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=137477285809710&w=2 > > So I take it that the PL111 is a totally different beast from > PL110 except for the single digit difference in the name. > Whereas PL180 and PL181 are essentially the same piece > of hardware... > > Then there is this patch set for DT support for the CLCD which > appears to be orthogonal: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=137968689722364&w=2 > > Pawel, is this coming along? Last week I was about to answer that this was my last word in the subject ;-) but then I decided to give it another go, trying to address the last - I think - controversial bit, being the pads property. Made it much simpler and optional, so it should be in anybody's (namely the DRM driver and bindings) way. Will post in a second. Pawel