From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_REQUESTS oddness Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 15:53:41 +0000 Message-ID: <1394121221.13270.10.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> References: <5318987C.3030303@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WLacH-0000zB-2D for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 15:53:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5318987C.3030303@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Zoltan Kiss Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Wei Liu List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 15:47 +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote: > By my understanding, there is no way rsp could be smaller than req, so > there is no point having this. Am I missing something? It happens during wraparound, i.e. after req has wrapped but rsp hasn't yet. Ian.