From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: Does IPv6 support Jumbograms ? Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:01:15 -0700 Message-ID: <1397138475.16584.27.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> References: <5345A2B3.7040602@gmail.com> <1397079665.16584.17.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20140409223546.GH27255@order.stressinduktion.org> <1397090170.16584.21.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20140410132842.GI27255@order.stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Francois WELLENREITER , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Frederic Sowa Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:43372 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933829AbaDJOBR (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:01:17 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id bj1so4018199pad.2 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:01:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140410132842.GI27255@order.stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 15:28 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > I thought ip6_default_advmss will deal with this which correctly limits the > mtu. Capping dst_mtu would make it harder to implement jumbograms some day. I doubt we'll do this (jumbo grams) This is a terrible academic idea.