From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:42644 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933039AbaDVPHO (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:07:14 -0400 Message-ID: <1398179202.4211.15.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20140422_170751_516656_47BC2019) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] net: rfkill: gpio: Add device tree support From: Johannes Berg To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Linus Walleij , "John W. Linville" , Maxime Ripard , Arnd Bergmann , Heikki Krogerus , Mika Westerberg , Alexandre Courbot , Stephen Warren , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:06:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1397544101-18135-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> References: <1397544101-18135-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 14:41 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > The first 2 patches should go through the gpio tree. The 4 rfkill-gpio > patches should go through the same tree that Heikki's patches are > in. Maxime, can you take the last one? Are there no dependencies? Maybe it'd be easier if you sent it as separate patch series then? I can take those four patches into my topic branch on top of Heikki's patches, but in any case, there seem to be a bunch of comments/discussions so for now I'm not going to do anything with them. johannes From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] net: rfkill: gpio: Add device tree support Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:06:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1398179202.4211.15.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1397544101-18135-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1397544101-18135-1-git-send-email-wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Linus Walleij , "John W. Linville" , Maxime Ripard , Arnd Bergmann , Heikki Krogerus , Mika Westerberg , Alexandre Courbot , Stephen Warren , linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 14:41 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > The first 2 patches should go through the gpio tree. The 4 rfkill-gpio > patches should go through the same tree that Heikki's patches are > in. Maxime, can you take the last one? Are there no dependencies? Maybe it'd be easier if you sent it as separate patch series then? I can take those four patches into my topic branch on top of Heikki's patches, but in any case, there seem to be a bunch of comments/discussions so for now I'm not going to do anything with them. johannes From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: johannes@sipsolutions.net (Johannes Berg) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:06:42 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/7] net: rfkill: gpio: Add device tree support In-Reply-To: <1397544101-18135-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> References: <1397544101-18135-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> Message-ID: <1398179202.4211.15.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 14:41 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > The first 2 patches should go through the gpio tree. The 4 rfkill-gpio > patches should go through the same tree that Heikki's patches are > in. Maxime, can you take the last one? Are there no dependencies? Maybe it'd be easier if you sent it as separate patch series then? I can take those four patches into my topic branch on top of Heikki's patches, but in any case, there seem to be a bunch of comments/discussions so for now I'm not going to do anything with them. johannes