From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 26014: trouble: blocked/broken/pass Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:06:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1398672378.23380.88.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> References: <1398589858.23380.73.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <1398596651.19277.114.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> <1398671306.23380.84.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <1398671878.23380.87.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1398671878.23380.87.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "xen.org" Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 08:57 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 08:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Sun, 2014-04-27 at 12:04 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > production-config: Update to newer debian installer snapshot. > > > > This fixed the x86 machines but unfortunately the armhf kernel which it > > picked up from backports was buggy and failed to load the scsi disk > > module with: > > [ 176.286313] crc_t10dif: Unknown symbol crc_t10dif_generic (err 0) > > > > This has happened with both of the two kernel (3.12 and 3.13) which I've > > pulled from backports. It looks like we might need a newer version of > > depmod/modprobe et al. This is going to involve some poking to figure > > out... > > Short term what I've done is to regenerate today's installer for amd64 > and i386 and symlink armhf to the old (2013-12-12) image -- since we use > a backports kernel on armhf it is unaffected by the new point release. > I've pushed the following to pretest I also killed all the inprogress jobs for all branches since they weren't going to get anywhere. Ian.