From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [xen-4.4-testing test] 25979: regressions - FAIL Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 11:25:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1398939938.28650.1.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> References: <535A646C020000780000C461@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WfoBT-0000Pc-6n for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 01 May 2014 10:25:43 +0000 In-Reply-To: <535A646C020000780000C461@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 12:34 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 25.04.14 at 13:11, wrote: > > flight 25979 xen-4.4-testing real [real] > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25979/ > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > including tests which could not be run: > > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 25794 > > This has been failing for the last several runs, yet again without > me being able to see anything suspicious in the logs. The screen > shots of the guest suggest it came mostly up, but may still be > doing something before being fully up. Yet again, just like noted > for one of the -unstable failures recently, the 4th boot of the > guest is suspiciously close to the 7000s timeout... ... it was also run on lake-frog. Ian.