From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDDCC433DB for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 20:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2371B2389F for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 20:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726943AbhAUUoT (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:44:19 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:54930 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725923AbhAUUoS (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:44:18 -0500 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10LKgZa4107307; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:42:35 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1611261755; bh=6APyx96OlhqoF+YR2i5KZliKDUq0CYB8+gOzH+jzq6Q=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Ijt0SBzBcr5uIemXFfWEYbvoF12ffedz5byDDwl5ZsunLjP+RO5VxwUYx2mhJmUVA GypWyM78BjvXOb6svPg1toWA+L4EcDQrOrzP6KJ4QJU8UWY8fUrfb/oZrk8QCexpb6 UGZkhCkX3xkXbazyOKIOxH3H9fya69dik2P4N2cA= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 10LKgZxH035840 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:42:35 -0600 Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:42:35 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:42:35 -0600 Received: from [10.250.35.71] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10LKgYdA035534; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:42:34 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: dts: ti: Add support for AM642 SoC To: Nishanth Menon CC: Arnd Bergmann , Tony Lindgren , Dave Gerlach , , , Rob Herring , Vignesh Raghavendra , Sekhar Nori , Kishon Vijay Abraham , Lokesh Vutla , Aswath Govindraju References: <20210120202532.9011-1-d-gerlach@ti.com> <20210120202532.9011-4-d-gerlach@ti.com> <197af185-d2ea-3c76-d0bf-714485f8f195@ti.com> <20210121174639.jqbvem6b4ozd3six@sterling> <4ee6f005-2eee-42b2-b573-e10602839e1b@ti.com> <20210121183909.pwpboiptqbof2dfu@squint> <2b35fb8b-0477-f66d-bcbd-ad640664a888@ti.com> <20210121201344.amp54x6d5fty7rkf@shriek> From: Suman Anna Message-ID: <13be7980-1ce8-bf7f-a6cf-7de6469a1b9b@ti.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:42:34 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210121201344.amp54x6d5fty7rkf@shriek> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 1/21/21 2:13 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 13:57-20210121, Suman Anna wrote: >> This is all moot when your own tree doesn't boot properly. In this case, you are >> adding MMC nodes, but yet for a boot test, you are saying use linux-next for the >> nodes that were added or you need additional driver patches (which is not how >> maintainer-level trees are verified). > > Get your facts straight please. > > What do you mean does'nt boot? It does boot with initramfs which is > the minimum qual i had set for any new platform (along with. - your > need is for a device node to work - which is both a combination of > defconfig + driver updates. And please re-read my first email, and what I started out with. I am not sure "I will pick MMC nodes, but the entry criteria is only initramfs, and you need additional patches to get MMC boot to work" is right. Normal thing to do is to take in the next merge cycle. > >> >> Arnd, >> Can you please guide us here as to what is expected in general, given that the >> pull-request from Nishanth goes through you, and if there is some pre-existing >> norms around this? >> >> Tony, >> Appreciate your input as well since you probably have dealt with these kinda of >> dependencies on OMAP. > > I am more than happy to drop this entire SoC off my queue (I am yet to > pick it up), which is probably what I will do. > You are the maintainer, do what feels right to you. You can as well wait for the MMC driver changes to be in, and then pick up the series next merge window. Or you can accept the versions without taking in pieces that have external dependencies. regards Suman From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215ABC433E0 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 20:44:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6FB82389F for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 20:44:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C6FB82389F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=C+38znSSKIs5nGuJqN/YMM6iE0IMoSb78R/uXKkKNZY=; b=aeQAjBLY8ItMHvs+C5Izdrpqx RTmI4XZfxxfXdZA0gTHKwjCbEZ4cFjelDW2ORKRvQXkQMxGLbo+ZbwieSxVi7ukpL980iIx80OS18 lTd8GrF+QOBhxj9tG1rBNKbIQHSdfgcgd7cDwPcRQjEvbgZL/QWnpGEkCqLR0H5mpKm2yO7OKPPtM DTdQLN56sWs+Kxq86Lm8CjxuS1x7bSjiXduxB+sAqJDAAq0gx/khu0hVx6sERF5CiVCtiW1tFVosB POxZ/KyW04htGB2g8j9hU4CNkjB5YLqQfBgrw2lnayVIXs1Z4FtCLiW31wVOcFymUjMwMRpAwSpHg rpLRmSy0A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l2gmw-0006LM-Kj; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 20:42:42 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l2gmu-0006Kn-7x for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 20:42:41 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10LKgZa4107307; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:42:35 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1611261755; bh=6APyx96OlhqoF+YR2i5KZliKDUq0CYB8+gOzH+jzq6Q=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Ijt0SBzBcr5uIemXFfWEYbvoF12ffedz5byDDwl5ZsunLjP+RO5VxwUYx2mhJmUVA GypWyM78BjvXOb6svPg1toWA+L4EcDQrOrzP6KJ4QJU8UWY8fUrfb/oZrk8QCexpb6 UGZkhCkX3xkXbazyOKIOxH3H9fya69dik2P4N2cA= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 10LKgZxH035840 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:42:35 -0600 Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:42:35 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:42:35 -0600 Received: from [10.250.35.71] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10LKgYdA035534; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:42:34 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: dts: ti: Add support for AM642 SoC To: Nishanth Menon References: <20210120202532.9011-1-d-gerlach@ti.com> <20210120202532.9011-4-d-gerlach@ti.com> <197af185-d2ea-3c76-d0bf-714485f8f195@ti.com> <20210121174639.jqbvem6b4ozd3six@sterling> <4ee6f005-2eee-42b2-b573-e10602839e1b@ti.com> <20210121183909.pwpboiptqbof2dfu@squint> <2b35fb8b-0477-f66d-bcbd-ad640664a888@ti.com> <20210121201344.amp54x6d5fty7rkf@shriek> From: Suman Anna Message-ID: <13be7980-1ce8-bf7f-a6cf-7de6469a1b9b@ti.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:42:34 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210121201344.amp54x6d5fty7rkf@shriek> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210121_154240_377981_395EFA59 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.99 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Vignesh Raghavendra , Arnd Bergmann , Dave Gerlach , Tony Lindgren , Sekhar Nori , Kishon Vijay Abraham , Lokesh Vutla , Rob Herring , Aswath Govindraju , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 1/21/21 2:13 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 13:57-20210121, Suman Anna wrote: >> This is all moot when your own tree doesn't boot properly. In this case, you are >> adding MMC nodes, but yet for a boot test, you are saying use linux-next for the >> nodes that were added or you need additional driver patches (which is not how >> maintainer-level trees are verified). > > Get your facts straight please. > > What do you mean does'nt boot? It does boot with initramfs which is > the minimum qual i had set for any new platform (along with. - your > need is for a device node to work - which is both a combination of > defconfig + driver updates. And please re-read my first email, and what I started out with. I am not sure "I will pick MMC nodes, but the entry criteria is only initramfs, and you need additional patches to get MMC boot to work" is right. Normal thing to do is to take in the next merge cycle. > >> >> Arnd, >> Can you please guide us here as to what is expected in general, given that the >> pull-request from Nishanth goes through you, and if there is some pre-existing >> norms around this? >> >> Tony, >> Appreciate your input as well since you probably have dealt with these kinda of >> dependencies on OMAP. > > I am more than happy to drop this entire SoC off my queue (I am yet to > pick it up), which is probably what I will do. > You are the maintainer, do what feels right to you. You can as well wait for the MMC driver changes to be in, and then pick up the series next merge window. Or you can accept the versions without taking in pieces that have external dependencies. regards Suman _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel