From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733546B1C1 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jul 2013 04:01:59 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,692,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="347709379" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.61]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jul 2013 04:01:58 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:01:57 +0100 Message-ID: <1400703.GdJurTDMZr@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.4 (Linux/3.8.0-26-generic; KDE/4.10.4; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/40] Review and ACK X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:01:59 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Thursday 18 July 2013 11:52:22 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 18 July 2013 07:34, Saul Wold wrote: > > valgrind: added perl dependency > > I presume the situation here is that a target perl wasn't actually > built, so adding an explicit runtime dependency causes it to be built > and therefore available in the feed for rpm to find. > > To me this says that the #!-to-dependency magic from rpmdeps isn't > really useful, as we then have to go and put explicit dependencies > back in to ensure the requirements are actually built. I have to say I too have wondered this. Perhaps these would be better implemented as QA warnings (that could be defaulted to errors) rather than just silently adding the dependencies. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre