From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vasu Dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] fc: ensure scan_work isn't active when freeing fc_rport Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 16:22:50 -0700 Message-ID: <1401751370.5752.5.camel@vi-devel> References: <1401461974-7879-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1401461974-7879-1-git-send-email-nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: fcoe-devel-bounces-s9riP+hp16TNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Sender: fcoe-devel-bounces-s9riP+hp16TNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org To: Neil Horman Cc: fcoe-devel-s9riP+hp16TNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org, linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 10:59 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > debugfs caught this: > WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:260 debug_print_object+0x83/0xa0() > ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: work_struct > hint: fc_scsi_scan_rport+0x0/0xd0 [scsi_transport_fc] > CPU: 1 PID: 184 Comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: G W > -------------- 3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.debug #1 > Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL120 G7, BIOS J01 07/01/2013 > Workqueue: fc_wq_5 fc_rport_final_delete [scsi_transport_fc] > Call Trace: > [] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b > [] warn_slowpath_common+0x61/0x80 > [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5c/0x80 > [] debug_print_object+0x83/0xa0 > [] ? fc_parse_wwn+0x100/0x100 > > [] debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x22b/0x270 > [] ? fc_rport_dev_release+0x1e/0x30 > [] kfree+0xd9/0x2d0 > [] fc_rport_dev_release+0x1e/0x30 > [] device_release+0x32/0xa0 > [] kobject_release+0x7e/0x1b0 > [] kobject_put+0x28/0x60 > [] put_device+0x17/0x20 > [] fc_rport_final_delete+0x165/0x210 > [] process_one_work+0x220/0x710 > [] ? process_one_work+0x1b4/0x710 > [] worker_thread+0x11b/0x3a0 > [] ? process_one_work+0x710/0x710 > [] kthread+0xed/0x100 > [] ? insert_kthread_work+0x80/0x80 > [] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 > [] ? insert_kthread_work+0x80/0x80 > > Seems to be because the scan_work work_struct might be active when the housing > fc_rport struct gets freed. Ensure that we cancel it prior to freeing the rport > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman > CC: linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > CC: Robert Love > CC: Vasu Dev > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c > index 4628fd5..5bd552c 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c > @@ -2548,6 +2548,7 @@ fc_rport_final_delete(struct work_struct *work) > fc_flush_devloss(shost); > if (!cancel_delayed_work(&rport->dev_loss_work)) > fc_flush_devloss(shost); > + cancel_work_sync(&rport->scan_work); Make sense to ensure pending work canceled, adding James Smart for his ACK as transport FC class author. Reviewed-by: Vasu Dev > spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags); > rport->flags &= ~FC_RPORT_DEVLOSS_PENDING; > }