Re: [Need Input] (informal) Automotive PV drivers subproject request

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>]

On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 13:25 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> On 09/06/2014 11:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Jun 2014, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> >>>>> Officially supported Xen Project repositories should only depend on
> >>>>> *upstreams* (Xen, Linux, ...). As we are talking about
> >>>>> git://xenbits.xen.org/pvdrivers.git here (as suggested by Aertem),
> >>>>> whatever is in that repo (owned by a subproject) should build and work
> >>>>> with vanilla Xen and Linux.
> >>>> Is this pvdrivers.git going to be a descendent (e.g. a git clone) of
> >>>> xen.git? Or is it a fresh repository which contains this new set of
> >>>> drivers which do not have a home in xen.git?
> >>> pvdrivers.git shall not be a clone for xen.git. Indeed, it is a set of
> >>> drivers that, as you said, do not have a home in xen.git or kernel.git
> >>>
> >> Indeed. What I've got in mind is something like the following:
> >>
> >> xenbits.org/[artem?]/xen-automotive.git  integration tree
> I am assuming xen-automotive.git = xen.git with hacks (as a staging tree)
> So wouldn't it be better the to have 
> xenbits/people/automotive/artem?/xen.git instead of a renamed tree?

Please can we keep subproject names out of the people namespace, it's
just confusing things (i.e. is that an official repo of some sort or
not?). /people/artem/xen.git is perfectly fine as a name for Artem's
repo.

Ian.