From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933780AbaFSQn4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:43:56 -0400 Received: from g4t3425.houston.hp.com ([15.201.208.53]:59834 "EHLO g4t3425.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932083AbaFSQnz (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:43:55 -0400 Message-ID: <1403196229.29394.10.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] perf bench: futex: Support operations for shared futexes From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp, aswin@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:43:49 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20140619164124.GH20252@kernel.org> References: <1402942467-10671-1-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.com> <1402942467-10671-10-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.com> <20140619164124.GH20252@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4 (3.6.4-3.fc18) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 13:41 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:14:27AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu: > > Unlike futex-hash, requeuing and wakeup benchmarks do not support > > shared futexes, limiting the usefulness of the programs. Correct > > this, and allow using the local -S parameter. The default remains > > using private futexes. > > Also isn't this benchmark related to something Darren did? Just checking > why he isn't in the CC list, Darren, does this all sound fine to you? Darren is well aware of these benchmarks, and we've discussed the topic in the past. This change doesn't conflict with what he maintains in the futextest suite. Thanks, Davidlohr