From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Knauth <thomas.knauth@gmx.de>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Maksym Planeta <mcsim.planeta@gmail.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Add a feature to drop caches selectively
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:03:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403690595.20275.14.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABhLV03_PNFiwsvt+yitcsKxz5TeVECCFavdNkbgQ+XzQqASaw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 10:25 +0200, Thomas Knauth wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Plus some explanations WRT why proc-based interface and what would be
> > the alternatives, what if tomorrow we want to extend the functionality
> > and drop caches only for certain file range, is this only for regular
> > files or also for directories, why posix_fadvice(DONTNEED) is not
> > sufficient.
>
> I suggested the idea originally. Let me address each of your questions in turn:
I'd also be interested to see some analysis about path-based interface
vs. file descriptor-base interface. What are cons and pros. E.g. if my
path is a symlink, with path-based interface it is not obvious whether I
drop caches for the symlink itself or caches of the target.
Note, if there are no answers, fine with me, I am asking just out of
curiosity.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-25 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-24 16:10 [PATCH] sysctl: Add a feature to drop caches selectively Maksym Planeta
2014-06-24 21:59 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-25 6:25 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-06-25 8:25 ` Thomas Knauth
2014-06-25 9:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-06-25 13:23 ` Thomas Knauth
2014-06-25 13:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-06-25 13:42 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-06-26 9:30 ` Maksym Planeta
2014-06-25 10:03 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2014-06-25 13:19 ` Thomas Knauth
2014-06-25 22:15 ` Pavel Machek
2014-06-26 1:06 ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-26 6:13 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-06-26 10:36 ` Bernd Schubert
2014-06-26 11:31 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-06-26 11:57 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-06-26 12:10 ` Bernd Schubert
2014-06-27 2:55 ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-27 2:55 ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-27 8:58 ` Bernd Schubert
2014-06-27 8:41 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2014-06-27 9:04 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-06-27 9:08 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-06-27 9:08 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-06-27 9:09 ` Bityutskiy, Artem
2014-06-27 9:09 ` Bityutskiy, Artem
2014-06-27 2:48 ` Dave Chinner
[not found] <CACVxJT_6sp=KDy=jCNBypYapKv_59W8LxFU4OiJEm6gt_SuZKg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-06-25 11:21 ` Alexey Dobriyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1403690595.20275.14.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcsim.planeta@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=thomas.knauth@gmx.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.