From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
sbw@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu] Parallelize and economize NOCB kthread wakeups
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 07:48:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1404366520.5137.90.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140703052124.GB4603@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 22:21 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 05:31:19AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > NO_HZ_FULL is a property of a set of CPUs. isolcpus is supposed to go
> > away as being a redundant interface to manage a single property of a set
> > of CPUs, but it's perfectly fine for NO_HZ_FULL to add an interface to
> > manage a single property of a set of CPUs. What am I missing?
>
> Well, for now, it can only be specified at build time or at boot time.
> In theory, it is possible to change a CPU from being callback-offloaded
> to not at runtime, but there would need to be an extremely good reason
> for adding that level of complexity. Lots of "fun" races in there...
Yeah, understood.
(still it's a NO_HZ_FULL wart though IMHO, would be prettier and more
usable if it eventually became unified with cpuset and learned how to
tap-dance properly;)
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-03 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-27 14:20 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu] Parallelize and economize NOCB kthread wakeups Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-27 15:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-06-27 15:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-06-27 15:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-27 15:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-02 12:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-02 13:46 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-02 16:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-03 2:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-02 15:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-02 16:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-02 17:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-02 17:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-02 17:29 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-02 17:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-03 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-02 17:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-03 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-08 13:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-03 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-08 13:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-03 3:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-03 5:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-03 5:48 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2014-07-03 16:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-04 3:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-04 5:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-04 6:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-04 21:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-05 13:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1404366520.5137.90.camel@marge.simpson.net \
--to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.