From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: Introduce rt real-time scheduler for Xen Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:06:48 +0200 Message-ID: <1405076808.29306.397.camel@Solace> References: <1405054198-29106-1-git-send-email-mengxu@cis.upenn.edu> <20140711105032.GC12584@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7826374392070239079==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140711105032.GC12584@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu Cc: ian.campbell@citrix.com, xisisu@gmail.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, xumengpanda@gmail.com, Meng Xu , lichong659@gmail.com, dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============7826374392070239079== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-A0YWoUOZ4fx0IKIreSrZ" --=-A0YWoUOZ4fx0IKIreSrZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-07-11 at 11:50 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:49:54AM -0400, Meng Xu wrote: > [...] > >=20 > > [PATCH RFC v1 1/4] rt: Add rt scheduler to hypervisor > > [PATCH RFC v1 2/4] xl for rt scheduler > > [PATCH RFC v1 3/4] libxl for rt scheduler > > [PATCH RFC v1 4/4] libxc for rt scheduler > >=20 >=20 > I have some general comments on how you arrange these patches. >=20 > At a glance of the title and code you should do them in the order of 1, > 4, 3 and 2. Apparently xl depends on libxl, libxl depends on libxc, and > libxc depends on hypervisor. You will break bisection with current > ordering. >=20 Yep, I agree with Wei. > And we normally write titles like > xen: add rt scheduler > libxl: introduce rt scheduler > xl: XXXX > etc. > start with component name and separate with colon. >=20 Indeed we do, and this helps quite a bit. > Last but not least, you need to CC relevant maintainers. You can find > out maintainers with scripts/get_maintainers.pl. >=20 Yes, but this one, Meng almost got it right, I think. Basically, Meng, you're missing hypervisors maintainers (at least for patch 1). :-) Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-A0YWoUOZ4fx0IKIreSrZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlO/xUgACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRYlgCfSxgfoyf/lM5SpaTtiY0fRt8h gpkAn269O2HK2YP0R+/YhZz7jOznRak1 =4zvO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-A0YWoUOZ4fx0IKIreSrZ-- --===============7826374392070239079== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============7826374392070239079==--