All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>,
	"Srivatsa S . Bhat" <srivatsa@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] cpufreq: Delete dead code related to policy save/restore
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 18:07:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406250448-470-6-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406250448-470-1-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org>

Since we no longer destroy/realloc policy during logical hotplug, most of
the policy save/restore code is dead code that doesn't get executed. Remove
those.

Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 82 +++++++++--------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 97edf05..b635e0e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@
  */
 static struct cpufreq_driver *cpufreq_driver;
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpufreq_policy *, cpufreq_cpu_data);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpufreq_policy *, cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback);
 static DEFINE_RWLOCK(cpufreq_driver_lock);
 DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_lock);
 static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_policy_list);
@@ -1006,22 +1005,6 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 }
 #endif
 
-static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_restore(unsigned int cpu)
-{
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
-
-	policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback, cpu);
-
-	read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
-
-	policy->governor = NULL;
-
-	return policy;
-}
-
 static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(void)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
@@ -1104,7 +1087,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 	int ret = -ENOMEM;
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	bool recover_policy = cpufreq_suspended;
 
 	pr_debug("adding CPU %u\n", cpu);
 
@@ -1142,31 +1124,11 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 
 	/* If we get this far, this is the first time we are adding the
 	 * policy */
-	recover_policy = false;
-
-	/*
-	 * Restore the saved policy when doing light-weight init and fall back
-	 * to the full init if that fails.
-	 */
-	policy = recover_policy ? cpufreq_policy_restore(cpu) : NULL;
-	if (!policy) {
-		recover_policy = false;
-		policy = cpufreq_policy_alloc();
-		if (!policy)
-			goto nomem_out;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * In the resume path, since we restore a saved policy, the assignment
-	 * to policy->cpu is like an update of the existing policy, rather than
-	 * the creation of a brand new one. So we need to perform this update
-	 * by invoking update_policy_cpu().
-	 */
-	if (recover_policy && cpu != policy->cpu)
-		update_policy_cpu(policy, cpu);
-	else
-		policy->cpu = cpu;
+	policy = cpufreq_policy_alloc();
+	if (!policy)
+		goto nomem_out;
 
+	policy->cpu = cpu;
 	cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu));
 
 	init_completion(&policy->kobj_unregister);
@@ -1190,10 +1152,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 	 */
 	cpumask_and(policy->cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask);
 
-	if (!recover_policy) {
-		policy->user_policy.min = policy->min;
-		policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
-	}
+	policy->user_policy.min = policy->min;
+	policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
 
 	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 	write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
@@ -1252,13 +1212,11 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
 				     CPUFREQ_START, policy);
 
-	if (!recover_policy) {
-		ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy, dev);
-		if (ret)
-			goto err_out_unregister;
-		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
-				CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy);
-	}
+	ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy, dev);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_out_unregister;
+	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
+			CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy);
 
 	write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
 	list_add(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list);
@@ -1266,10 +1224,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 
 	cpufreq_init_policy(policy);
 
-	if (!recover_policy) {
-		policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
-		policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
-	}
+	policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
+	policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
 	up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
 	kobject_uevent(&policy->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
@@ -1289,13 +1245,7 @@ err_get_freq:
 	if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
 		cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
 err_set_policy_cpu:
-	if (recover_policy) {
-		/* Do not leave stale fallback data behind. */
-		per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback, cpu) = NULL;
-		cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);
-	}
 	cpufreq_policy_free(policy);
-
 nomem_out:
 	up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
 
@@ -1442,8 +1392,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (!cpufreq_suspended)
-			cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);
+		cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);
 
 		/*
 		 * Perform the ->exit() even during light-weight tear-down,
@@ -1458,8 +1407,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
 		list_del(&policy->policy_list);
 		write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
 
-		if (!cpufreq_suspended)
-			cpufreq_policy_free(policy);
+		cpufreq_policy_free(policy);
 	}
 
 	per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu) = NULL;
-- 
1.8.2.1

The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: skannan@codeaurora.org (Saravana Kannan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] cpufreq: Delete dead code related to policy save/restore
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 18:07:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406250448-470-6-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406250448-470-1-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org>

Since we no longer destroy/realloc policy during logical hotplug, most of
the policy save/restore code is dead code that doesn't get executed. Remove
those.

Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 82 +++++++++--------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 97edf05..b635e0e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@
  */
 static struct cpufreq_driver *cpufreq_driver;
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpufreq_policy *, cpufreq_cpu_data);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpufreq_policy *, cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback);
 static DEFINE_RWLOCK(cpufreq_driver_lock);
 DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_lock);
 static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_policy_list);
@@ -1006,22 +1005,6 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 }
 #endif
 
-static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_restore(unsigned int cpu)
-{
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
-
-	policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback, cpu);
-
-	read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
-
-	policy->governor = NULL;
-
-	return policy;
-}
-
 static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(void)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
@@ -1104,7 +1087,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 	int ret = -ENOMEM;
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	bool recover_policy = cpufreq_suspended;
 
 	pr_debug("adding CPU %u\n", cpu);
 
@@ -1142,31 +1124,11 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 
 	/* If we get this far, this is the first time we are adding the
 	 * policy */
-	recover_policy = false;
-
-	/*
-	 * Restore the saved policy when doing light-weight init and fall back
-	 * to the full init if that fails.
-	 */
-	policy = recover_policy ? cpufreq_policy_restore(cpu) : NULL;
-	if (!policy) {
-		recover_policy = false;
-		policy = cpufreq_policy_alloc();
-		if (!policy)
-			goto nomem_out;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * In the resume path, since we restore a saved policy, the assignment
-	 * to policy->cpu is like an update of the existing policy, rather than
-	 * the creation of a brand new one. So we need to perform this update
-	 * by invoking update_policy_cpu().
-	 */
-	if (recover_policy && cpu != policy->cpu)
-		update_policy_cpu(policy, cpu);
-	else
-		policy->cpu = cpu;
+	policy = cpufreq_policy_alloc();
+	if (!policy)
+		goto nomem_out;
 
+	policy->cpu = cpu;
 	cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu));
 
 	init_completion(&policy->kobj_unregister);
@@ -1190,10 +1152,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 	 */
 	cpumask_and(policy->cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask);
 
-	if (!recover_policy) {
-		policy->user_policy.min = policy->min;
-		policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
-	}
+	policy->user_policy.min = policy->min;
+	policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
 
 	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 	write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
@@ -1252,13 +1212,11 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
 				     CPUFREQ_START, policy);
 
-	if (!recover_policy) {
-		ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy, dev);
-		if (ret)
-			goto err_out_unregister;
-		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
-				CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy);
-	}
+	ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy, dev);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_out_unregister;
+	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
+			CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy);
 
 	write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
 	list_add(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list);
@@ -1266,10 +1224,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 
 	cpufreq_init_policy(policy);
 
-	if (!recover_policy) {
-		policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
-		policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
-	}
+	policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
+	policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
 	up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
 	kobject_uevent(&policy->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
@@ -1289,13 +1245,7 @@ err_get_freq:
 	if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
 		cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
 err_set_policy_cpu:
-	if (recover_policy) {
-		/* Do not leave stale fallback data behind. */
-		per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback, cpu) = NULL;
-		cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);
-	}
 	cpufreq_policy_free(policy);
-
 nomem_out:
 	up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
 
@@ -1442,8 +1392,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (!cpufreq_suspended)
-			cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);
+		cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);
 
 		/*
 		 * Perform the ->exit() even during light-weight tear-down,
@@ -1458,8 +1407,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
 		list_del(&policy->policy_list);
 		write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
 
-		if (!cpufreq_suspended)
-			cpufreq_policy_free(policy);
+		cpufreq_policy_free(policy);
 	}
 
 	per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu) = NULL;
-- 
1.8.2.1

The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-25  1:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 205+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-10  2:37 [PATCH] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend Saravana Kannan
2014-07-10  2:37 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-11  4:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Saravana Kannan
2014-07-11  4:18   ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-11  6:19   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-11  6:19     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-11  6:19     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-11  9:59     ` skannan
2014-07-11  9:59       ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-11  9:59       ` skannan
2014-07-11 10:07       ` skannan
2014-07-11 10:07         ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-11 10:07         ` skannan
2014-07-11 10:52       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-11 10:52         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-11 10:52         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-12  2:44         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-12  2:44           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-12  2:44           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14  6:09           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14  6:09             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14  6:09             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14 19:08             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14 19:08               ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14 19:08               ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15  4:35               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15  4:35                 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15  4:35                 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15  5:36                 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15  5:36                   ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15  5:36                   ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15  5:52                   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15  5:52                     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15  5:52                     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15  6:58                   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-15  6:58                     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-15  6:58                     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-15 17:35                     ` skannan
2014-07-15 17:35                       ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-15 17:35                       ` skannan
2014-07-16  7:44                       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16  7:44                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16  7:44                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16  5:44                     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  5:44                       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  5:44                       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  7:49                       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16  7:49                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16  7:49                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-12  3:06     ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-12  3:06       ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-12  3:06       ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14  6:13       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14  6:13         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14  6:13         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14 19:10         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14 19:10           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14 19:10           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-11  7:43   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-11  7:43     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-11 10:02     ` skannan
2014-07-11 10:02       ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-15 22:47   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Simplify hotplug/suspend handling Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 22:47     ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 22:47     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 22:47       ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16  0:28       ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16  0:28         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16  8:30         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  8:30           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  8:30           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 19:19           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:19             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:19             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16  8:24       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  8:24         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  8:24         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 11:16         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 11:16           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 11:16           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 13:13           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 13:13             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 13:13             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 18:04             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 18:04               ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 18:04               ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 19:56             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:56               ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:56               ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-17  5:51               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-17  5:51                 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-17  5:51                 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 19:56           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:56             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:56             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-17  5:35             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-17  5:35               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-17  5:35               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-18  3:25               ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-18  3:25                 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-18  3:25                 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-18  4:19                 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-18  4:19                   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-18  4:19                   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 20:25         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 20:25           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 20:25           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 21:45           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 21:45             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 21:45             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-17  6:24           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-17  6:24             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-17  6:24             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 14:29       ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-07-16 14:29         ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-07-16 15:28         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 15:28           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 15:28           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 19:42           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:42             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:42             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 22:47     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: Simplify and fix mutual exclusion with hotplug Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 22:47       ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16  8:48       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  8:48         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  8:48         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 19:34         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:34           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:34           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07     ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Simplify hotplug/suspend handling Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07       ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07       ` [PATCH v4 1/5] cpufreq: Don't wait for CPU to going offline to restart governor Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 20:47         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 20:47           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07       ` [PATCH v4 2/5] cpufreq: Keep track of which CPU owns the kobj/sysfs nodes separately Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07  9:02         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07  9:02           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07  9:02           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-25  1:07       ` [PATCH v4 3/5] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 21:56         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-31 21:56           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-31 22:15           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 22:15             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 23:48           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 23:48             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 23:48             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07 10:51           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 10:51             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 10:51             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-12  9:17             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-12  9:17               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-12  9:17               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 10:48         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 10:48           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 10:48           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-11 22:13           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-11 22:13             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-11 22:13             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-12  8:51             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-12  8:51               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-12  8:51               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-25  1:07       ` [PATCH v4 4/5] cpufreq: Properly handle physical CPU hot-add/hot-remove Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07 11:02         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 11:02           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 11:02           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-11 22:15           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-11 22:15             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-11 22:15             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07       ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2014-07-25  1:07         ` [PATCH v4 5/5] cpufreq: Delete dead code related to policy save/restore Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07 11:06         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 11:06           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 11:06           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-29  5:52       ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Simplify hotplug/suspend handling skannan
2014-07-29  5:52         ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-29  5:52         ` skannan
2014-07-30  0:29       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-30  0:29         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-31 20:25         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 20:25           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07  6:04         ` skannan
2014-08-07  6:04           ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-10-16  8:53       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-10-16  8:53         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-10-16  8:53         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-10-23 21:41         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-10-23 21:41           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-10-23 21:41           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 22:02 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-16 22:02   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-16 22:35   ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 22:35     ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-24  3:02   ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-24  3:02     ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-24  5:04     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-24  5:04       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-24  5:04       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-24  9:12       ` skannan
2014-07-24  9:12         ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-24  9:12         ` skannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1406250448-470-6-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org \
    --to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=srivatsa@mit.edu \
    --cc=toddpoynor@google.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.