From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755924AbaHHFsI (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2014 01:48:08 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]:45746 "EHLO mail-we0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755543AbaHHFsE (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2014 01:48:04 -0400 Message-ID: <1407476878.3604.0.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Subject: Re: Weird NET_RX softirq behavior From: Eric Dumazet To: Jisheng Zhang Cc: Dmitry Popov , "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 07:47:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20140808103734.677bff7e@xhacker> References: <20140807171050.77819b10@xhacker> <20140807181813.37b73927513266381d55ad0d@qrator.net> <20140808103734.677bff7e@xhacker> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 10:37 +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > nd and recive 7 packets so far, about 1400bytes. Seems small > comparing with the CPU1 and CPU2 NET_RX softirq numbers, right? > > Any other possible case? Multicast loop. Check dev_loopback_xmit() and its callers.