From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gerg@uclinux.org Subject: [PATCH 0/2] m68k: propose move of platform coldfire Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:04:05 +1000 Message-ID: <1408590247-10875-1-git-send-email-gerg@uclinux.org> Return-path: Received: from nschwqsrv02p.mx.bigpond.com ([61.9.189.234]:62653 "EHLO nschwqsrv02p.mx.bigpond.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751898AbaHUDLX (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:11:23 -0400 Received: from nschwcmgw08p ([61.9.190.168]) by nschwmtas01p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20140821030408.ZZGC17954.nschwmtas01p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwcmgw08p> for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 03:04:08 +0000 Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org Hi All, I propose that we move the arch/m68k/platform/coldfire directory to be directly under arch/m68k. The current platform/ structure was inhereted from the move of m68knommu, and is inconsistent with the existing m68k platforms (each having a directory under arch/m68k). Moving platform/coldfire is quite strait forward. The following patches do a move, and fix up the broken pathname comments. This does leave the question of what to do with the other directories still under arch/m68k/platform, namely 68000 and 68360. Should they be moved in the same way as coldfire? Regards Greg