From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: Philipp Zabel
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] ARM: imx6: gpc: Add PU power domain for GPU/VPU
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:07:03 +0200
Message-ID: <1410340023.4508.4.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de>
References: <1410267915-18126-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
<1410267915-18126-3-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
<20140910034918.GA28759@Robin-OptiPlex-780>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path:
In-Reply-To: <20140910034918.GA28759@Robin-OptiPlex-780>
Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Robin Gong
Cc: Shawn Guo , Mark Rutland , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ulf Hansson , Tomasz Figa , Rob Herring , Geert Uytterhoeven , kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Hi Robin,
Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2014, 11:49 +0800 schrieb Robin Gong:
> Hi Philipp,
> Thanks for your great job, power domain make things clear. But looks your
> patch depend on 'PU regulator', if there is no PU regulator passed down from
> dts, we'll never implement your way for PGC. On i.mx6sx, there is no internal
> PU regulator, so I suggest you consider this case.
thank you for the hint. Would making the PU regulator optional be enough
to make this work on i.MX6SX?
regards
Philipp
---8<---
From: Philipp Zabel
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: imx6: gpc: Make PU regulator optional
On i.MX6SX there is no internal PU regulator, make it optional.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel
---
arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c | 17 +++++++++++------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
index cdf8a06..b36703d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
@@ -186,7 +186,8 @@ static int imx6q_pm_pu_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
/* Wait ISO + ISO2SW IPG clock cycles */
ndelay((iso + iso2sw) * 1000 / 66);
- regulator_disable(pu->reg);
+ if (pu->reg)
+ regulator_disable(pu->reg);
return 0;
}
@@ -197,8 +198,9 @@ static int imx6q_pm_pu_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
int i, ret, sw, sw2iso;
u32 val;
- ret = regulator_enable(pu->reg);
- if (ret) {
+ if (pu->reg)
+ ret = regulator_enable(pu->reg);
+ if (pu->reg && ret) {
pr_err("%s: failed to enable regulator: %d\n", __func__, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -309,7 +311,9 @@ static int imx_gpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct regulator *pu_reg;
int ret;
- pu_reg = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "pu");
+ pu_reg = devm_regulator_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "pu");
+ if (PTR_ERR(pu_reg) == -ENODEV)
+ pu_reg = NULL;
if (IS_ERR(pu_reg)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(pu_reg);
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get pu regulator: %d\n", ret);
@@ -317,8 +321,9 @@ static int imx_gpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
/* The regulator is initially enabled */
- ret = regulator_enable(pu_reg);
- if (ret < 0) {
+ if (pu_reg)
+ ret = regulator_enable(pu_reg);
+ if (pu_reg && ret < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable pu regulator: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel)
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:07:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v8 2/5] ARM: imx6: gpc: Add PU power domain for GPU/VPU
In-Reply-To: <20140910034918.GA28759@Robin-OptiPlex-780>
References: <1410267915-18126-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
<1410267915-18126-3-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
<20140910034918.GA28759@Robin-OptiPlex-780>
Message-ID: <1410340023.4508.4.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org
Hi Robin,
Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2014, 11:49 +0800 schrieb Robin Gong:
> Hi Philipp,
> Thanks for your great job, power domain make things clear. But looks your
> patch depend on 'PU regulator', if there is no PU regulator passed down from
> dts, we'll never implement your way for PGC. On i.mx6sx, there is no internal
> PU regulator, so I suggest you consider this case.
thank you for the hint. Would making the PU regulator optional be enough
to make this work on i.MX6SX?
regards
Philipp
---8<---
From: Philipp Zabel
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: imx6: gpc: Make PU regulator optional
On i.MX6SX there is no internal PU regulator, make it optional.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel
---
arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c | 17 +++++++++++------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
index cdf8a06..b36703d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
@@ -186,7 +186,8 @@ static int imx6q_pm_pu_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
/* Wait ISO + ISO2SW IPG clock cycles */
ndelay((iso + iso2sw) * 1000 / 66);
- regulator_disable(pu->reg);
+ if (pu->reg)
+ regulator_disable(pu->reg);
return 0;
}
@@ -197,8 +198,9 @@ static int imx6q_pm_pu_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
int i, ret, sw, sw2iso;
u32 val;
- ret = regulator_enable(pu->reg);
- if (ret) {
+ if (pu->reg)
+ ret = regulator_enable(pu->reg);
+ if (pu->reg && ret) {
pr_err("%s: failed to enable regulator: %d\n", __func__, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -309,7 +311,9 @@ static int imx_gpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct regulator *pu_reg;
int ret;
- pu_reg = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "pu");
+ pu_reg = devm_regulator_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "pu");
+ if (PTR_ERR(pu_reg) == -ENODEV)
+ pu_reg = NULL;
if (IS_ERR(pu_reg)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(pu_reg);
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get pu regulator: %d\n", ret);
@@ -317,8 +321,9 @@ static int imx_gpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
/* The regulator is initially enabled */
- ret = regulator_enable(pu_reg);
- if (ret < 0) {
+ if (pu_reg)
+ ret = regulator_enable(pu_reg);
+ if (pu_reg && ret < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable pu regulator: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
--
2.1.0