From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Bolle Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:14:55 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP completely Message-Id: <1410520495.31130.37.camel@x220> List-Id: References: <1406551632.5397.17.camel@x220> <1410511111.31130.4.camel@x220> <1410518771.31130.22.camel@x220> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 13:03 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Paul, Rafael, > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > >> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig | 1 - > >> > drivers/devfreq/Kconfig | 1 - > > > > Were patches submitted for these two files too? If so, we can probably > > just drop my patch. > > Rafael said: "I've queued this up for 3.17, thanks!" > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/274681.html > > But it's not in -next. I think that patch landed as commit 78c5e0bb145d. But for some unknown reason it didn't remove all selects statements for ARCH_HAS_OPP. The odd thing here is that the last select statements I remove in this patch are all to be found in Kconfig files that actually were touched in that commit. Perhaps these select statements were merged back in during conflict resolution. I have no idea. Paul Bolle From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754083AbaILLPB (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:15:01 -0400 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.7]:55134 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752835AbaILLO7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:14:59 -0400 Message-ID: <1410520495.31130.37.camel@x220> Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP completely From: Paul Bolle To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Nishanth Menon , Mark Brown , Viresh Kumar , Rob Herring , Shawn Guo , Simon Horman , Tony Lindgren , Russell King , Magnus Damm , MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , linux-omap , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux-sh list , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , lkml Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:14:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1406551632.5397.17.camel@x220> <1410511111.31130.4.camel@x220> <1410518771.31130.22.camel@x220> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-3.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Sep 2014 11:14:56.0393 (UTC) FILETIME=[C89A6F90:01CFCE7A] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 13:03 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Paul, Rafael, > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > >> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig | 1 - > >> > drivers/devfreq/Kconfig | 1 - > > > > Were patches submitted for these two files too? If so, we can probably > > just drop my patch. > > Rafael said: "I've queued this up for 3.17, thanks!" > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/274681.html > > But it's not in -next. I think that patch landed as commit 78c5e0bb145d. But for some unknown reason it didn't remove all selects statements for ARCH_HAS_OPP. The odd thing here is that the last select statements I remove in this patch are all to be found in Kconfig files that actually were touched in that commit. Perhaps these select statements were merged back in during conflict resolution. I have no idea. Paul Bolle From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Bolle Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP completely Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:14:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1410520495.31130.37.camel@x220> References: <1406551632.5397.17.camel@x220> <1410511111.31130.4.camel@x220> <1410518771.31130.22.camel@x220> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.7]:55134 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752835AbaILLO7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:14:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Nishanth Menon , Mark Brown , Viresh Kumar , Rob Herring , Shawn Guo , Simon Horman , Tony Lindgren , Russell King , Magnus Damm , MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , linux-omap , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux-sh list , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , lkml On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 13:03 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Paul, Rafael, > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > >> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig | 1 - > >> > drivers/devfreq/Kconfig | 1 - > > > > Were patches submitted for these two files too? If so, we can probably > > just drop my patch. > > Rafael said: "I've queued this up for 3.17, thanks!" > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/274681.html > > But it's not in -next. I think that patch landed as commit 78c5e0bb145d. But for some unknown reason it didn't remove all selects statements for ARCH_HAS_OPP. The odd thing here is that the last select statements I remove in this patch are all to be found in Kconfig files that actually were touched in that commit. Perhaps these select statements were merged back in during conflict resolution. I have no idea. Paul Bolle From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pebolle@tiscali.nl (Paul Bolle) Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:14:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP completely In-Reply-To: References: <1406551632.5397.17.camel@x220> <1410511111.31130.4.camel@x220> <1410518771.31130.22.camel@x220> Message-ID: <1410520495.31130.37.camel@x220> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 13:03 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Paul, Rafael, > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > >> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig | 1 - > >> > drivers/devfreq/Kconfig | 1 - > > > > Were patches submitted for these two files too? If so, we can probably > > just drop my patch. > > Rafael said: "I've queued this up for 3.17, thanks!" > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/274681.html > > But it's not in -next. I think that patch landed as commit 78c5e0bb145d. But for some unknown reason it didn't remove all selects statements for ARCH_HAS_OPP. The odd thing here is that the last select statements I remove in this patch are all to be found in Kconfig files that actually were touched in that commit. Perhaps these select statements were merged back in during conflict resolution. I have no idea. Paul Bolle