All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com,
	jogreene@redhat.com, Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Subject: [net-next 07/11] e1000: perform copybreak ahead of DMA unmap
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 05:33:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1410525231-19851-8-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410525231-19851-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>

From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>

Currently we unmap the DMA range, then copy to new skb.
Change this so we can keep the mapping in case the data is copied.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
index e26a32d..79626ba 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
@@ -4077,6 +4077,16 @@ static bool e1000_tbi_should_accept(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
 	return false;
 }
 
+static struct sk_buff *e1000_alloc_rx_skb(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
+					  unsigned int bufsz)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(adapter->netdev, bufsz);
+
+	if (unlikely(!skb))
+		adapter->alloc_rx_buff_failed++;
+	return skb;
+}
+
 /**
  * e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq - Send received data up the network stack; legacy
  * @adapter: board private structure
@@ -4262,25 +4272,25 @@ next_desc:
 /* this should improve performance for small packets with large amounts
  * of reassembly being done in the stack
  */
-static void e1000_check_copybreak(struct net_device *netdev,
-				 struct e1000_buffer *buffer_info,
-				 u32 length, struct sk_buff **skb)
+static struct sk_buff *e1000_copybreak(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
+				       struct e1000_buffer *buffer_info,
+				       u32 length, const void *data)
 {
-	struct sk_buff *new_skb;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
 	if (length > copybreak)
-		return;
+		return NULL;
 
-	new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length);
-	if (!new_skb)
-		return;
+	skb = e1000_alloc_rx_skb(adapter, length);
+	if (!skb)
+		return NULL;
+
+	dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&adapter->pdev->dev, buffer_info->dma,
+				length, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+
+	memcpy(skb_put(skb, length), data, length);
 
-	skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb, -NET_IP_ALIGN,
-				       (*skb)->data - NET_IP_ALIGN,
-				       length + NET_IP_ALIGN);
-	/* save the skb in buffer_info as good */
-	buffer_info->skb = *skb;
-	*skb = new_skb;
+	return skb;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -4318,10 +4328,18 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
 		rmb(); /* read descriptor and rx_buffer_info after status DD */
 
 		status = rx_desc->status;
-		skb = buffer_info->skb;
-		buffer_info->skb = NULL;
+		length = le16_to_cpu(rx_desc->length);
 
-		prefetch(skb->data - NET_IP_ALIGN);
+		prefetch(buffer_info->skb->data - NET_IP_ALIGN);
+		skb = e1000_copybreak(adapter, buffer_info, length,
+				      buffer_info->skb->data);
+		if (!skb) {
+			skb = buffer_info->skb;
+			buffer_info->skb = NULL;
+			dma_unmap_single(&pdev->dev, buffer_info->dma,
+					 buffer_info->length, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+			buffer_info->dma = 0;
+		}
 
 		if (++i == rx_ring->count) i = 0;
 		next_rxd = E1000_RX_DESC(*rx_ring, i);
@@ -4331,11 +4349,7 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
 
 		cleaned = true;
 		cleaned_count++;
-		dma_unmap_single(&pdev->dev, buffer_info->dma,
-				 buffer_info->length, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
-		buffer_info->dma = 0;
 
-		length = le16_to_cpu(rx_desc->length);
 		/* !EOP means multiple descriptors were used to store a single
 		 * packet, if thats the case we need to toss it.  In fact, we
 		 * to toss every packet with the EOP bit clear and the next
@@ -4348,8 +4362,7 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
 		if (adapter->discarding) {
 			/* All receives must fit into a single buffer */
 			netdev_dbg(netdev, "Receive packet consumed multiple buffers\n");
-			/* recycle */
-			buffer_info->skb = skb;
+			dev_kfree_skb(skb);
 			if (status & E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP)
 				adapter->discarding = false;
 			goto next_desc;
@@ -4363,8 +4376,7 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
 			} else if (netdev->features & NETIF_F_RXALL) {
 				goto process_skb;
 			} else {
-				/* recycle */
-				buffer_info->skb = skb;
+				dev_kfree_skb(skb);
 				goto next_desc;
 			}
 		}
@@ -4379,9 +4391,10 @@ process_skb:
 			 */
 			length -= 4;
 
-		e1000_check_copybreak(netdev, buffer_info, length, &skb);
-
-		skb_put(skb, length);
+		if (buffer_info->skb == NULL)
+			skb_put(skb, length);
+		else /* copybreak skb */
+			skb_trim(skb, length);
 
 		/* Receive Checksum Offload */
 		e1000_rx_checksum(adapter,
@@ -4527,7 +4540,7 @@ static void e1000_alloc_rx_buffers(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
 		skb = buffer_info->skb;
 		if (skb) {
 			skb_trim(skb, 0);
-			goto map_skb;
+			goto skip;
 		}
 
 		skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, bufsz);
@@ -4564,7 +4577,6 @@ static void e1000_alloc_rx_buffers(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
 		}
 		buffer_info->skb = skb;
 		buffer_info->length = adapter->rx_buffer_len;
-map_skb:
 		buffer_info->dma = dma_map_single(&pdev->dev,
 						  skb->data,
 						  buffer_info->length,
@@ -4602,6 +4614,7 @@ map_skb:
 		rx_desc = E1000_RX_DESC(*rx_ring, i);
 		rx_desc->buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(buffer_info->dma);
 
+skip:
 		if (unlikely(++i == rx_ring->count))
 			i = 0;
 		buffer_info = &rx_ring->buffer_info[i];
-- 
1.9.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-12 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-12 12:33 [net-next 00/11][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2014-09-12 Jeff Kirsher
2014-09-12 12:33 ` [net-next 01/11] ixgbe: Resolve warnings produced in W=2 builds Jeff Kirsher
2014-09-12 12:33 ` [net-next 02/11] ixgbevf: Resolve missing-field-initializers warnings Jeff Kirsher
2014-09-12 12:33 ` [net-next 03/11] ixgbe: Drop Rx alloc at end of Rx cleanup Jeff Kirsher
2014-09-12 12:33 ` [net-next 04/11] ixgbe: Refactor busy poll socket code to address multiple issues Jeff Kirsher
2014-09-12 12:33 ` [net-next 05/11] e1000: move e1000_tbi_adjust_stats to where its used Jeff Kirsher
2014-09-12 12:33 ` [net-next 06/11] e1000: move tbi workaround code into helper function Jeff Kirsher
2014-09-12 12:33 ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2014-09-12 12:33 ` [net-next 08/11] e1000: add and use e1000_rx_buffer info for Rx Jeff Kirsher
2014-09-12 12:33 ` [net-next 09/11] e1000: rename struct e1000_buffer to e1000_tx_buffer Jeff Kirsher
2014-09-12 12:33 ` [net-next 10/11] e1000: convert to build_skb Jeff Kirsher
2014-09-12 12:33 ` [net-next 11/11] e1000: switch to napi_gro_frags api Jeff Kirsher
2014-09-13 16:43 ` [net-next 00/11][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2014-09-12 David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1410525231-19851-8-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=jogreene@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
    --cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.