From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chin Liang See Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:43:39 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] u-boot-socfpga repository In-Reply-To: <201409150327.02069.marex@denx.de> References: <20140911171431.GW25506@bill-the-cat> <20140914164656.GC25506@bill-the-cat> <1410743231.2077.9.camel@clsee-VirtualBox.altera.com> <201409150327.02069.marex@denx.de> Message-ID: <1410745419.2077.29.camel@clsee-VirtualBox.altera.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Marex, On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 03:27 +0200, marex at denx.de wrote: > On Monday, September 15, 2014 at 03:07:11 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 12:46 -0400, ZY - trini wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:02:08AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > > > > Hi Wolfgang, > > > > > > > > On 9/12/14, 5:51 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > > > Dear Dinh, > > > > > > > > > In message <541373AD.4020902@opensource.altera.com> you wrote: > > > > Also, I went back and look at the "flurry" of patches for socfpga, and > > > > I must commend Tom Rini on a fantastic job for applying the patches. I > > > > was only able to find 1 patch that needed addressing: > > > > > > > > [socfpga: generic board for socfpga] from Pavel Machek > > > > > > Can you test it, and Reviewed-by/Acked-by/Tested-by or something the > > > patch? patchwork collects these and that is a big part of our review > > > and merge process here. > > > > This is actually a big patch which should be split to smaller patch. > > Nevertheless, I already started reviewing it last week and hopefully can > > get it reviewed by today. > > I did manage to split that big patch, clean it up and update it to match the > latest rocketboards 2013.01.01 code. Please give me a few more days to finish > with this and post the result. It's about 50 patches so far. I can send them to > you off-list if you want to check them early. > Sure, will hear more from you then. In the mean time, I can provide my comments on the big patch today so we can speed this up. > So far, the SPL cannot be built and I still depend on the one generated by > Quartus. Yup, the missing driver is the SDRAM which is due to legal complication. I believe its resolved now and will send the first patch soon. Hopefully this would get the SPL build and running. > On the other hand , the rest of the U-Boot works well, incl. ethernet > and SDMMC . I also fixed L1 and L2 cache issues all over the place and cleaned > up the code, so the thing is also much faster now. > Great to hear that. Thanks for verifying that the U-Boot is working too. Thanks again for your helps! And Pavel plus his ACKs :) Thanks Chin Liang