From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754722AbaIOTTW (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:19:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:57569 "EHLO mail-pa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754564AbaIOTTO (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:19:14 -0400 From: Alexei Starovoitov To: "David S. Miller" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Daniel Borkmann , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Chema Gonzalez , Eric Dumazet , Peter Zijlstra , Pablo Neira Ayuso , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v12 net-next 07/11] bpf: verifier (add ability to receive verification log) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:18:37 -0700 Message-Id: <1410808721-27493-8-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1410808721-27493-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> References: <1410808721-27493-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org add optional attributes for BPF_PROG_LOAD syscall: union bpf_attr { struct { ... __u32 log_level; /* verbosity level of eBPF verifier */ __u32 log_size; /* size of user buffer */ char __user *log_buf; /* user supplied buffer */ }; }; when log_level > 0 the verifier will return its verification log in the user supplied buffer 'log_buf' which can be used by program author to analyze why verifier rejected given program. 'Understanding eBPF verifier messages' section of Documentation/networking/filter.txt provides several examples of these messages, like the program: BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), BPF_CALL_FUNC(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 4, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), will be rejected with the following multi-line message in log_buf: 0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0 1: (bf) r2 = r10 2: (07) r2 += -8 3: (b7) r1 = 0 4: (85) call 1 5: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1 R0=map_ptr R10=fp 6: (7a) *(u64 *)(r0 +4) = 0 misaligned access off 4 size 8 The format of the output can change at any time as verifier evolves. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 + kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 +- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 235 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index a9d56d128b8c..a6331f2ccf93 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ union bpf_attr { __u32 insn_cnt; const struct bpf_insn __user *insns; const char __user *license; + __u32 log_level; /* verbosity level of eBPF verifier */ + __u32 log_size; /* size of user buffer */ + char __user *log_buf; /* user supplied buffer */ }; }; diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 10a50453d101..7c062a34c696 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get(u32 ufd) } /* last field in 'union bpf_attr' used by this command */ -#define BPF_PROG_LOAD_LAST_FIELD license +#define BPF_PROG_LOAD_LAST_FIELD log_buf static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr) { diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index d6f9c3d6b4d7..c721d1f4d3cc 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -125,9 +125,244 @@ * are set to NOT_INIT to indicate that they are no longer readable. */ +/* single container for all structs + * one verifier_env per bpf_check() call + */ +struct verifier_env { +}; + +/* verbose verifier prints what it's seeing + * bpf_check() is called under lock, so no race to access these global vars + */ +static u32 log_level, log_size, log_len; +static char *log_buf; + +static DEFINE_MUTEX(bpf_verifier_lock); + +/* log_level controls verbosity level of eBPF verifier. + * verbose() is used to dump the verification trace to the log, so the user + * can figure out what's wrong with the program + */ +static void verbose(const char *fmt, ...) +{ + va_list args; + + if (log_level == 0 || log_len >= log_size - 1) + return; + + va_start(args, fmt); + log_len += vscnprintf(log_buf + log_len, log_size - log_len, fmt, args); + va_end(args); +} + +static const char *const bpf_class_string[] = { + [BPF_LD] = "ld", + [BPF_LDX] = "ldx", + [BPF_ST] = "st", + [BPF_STX] = "stx", + [BPF_ALU] = "alu", + [BPF_JMP] = "jmp", + [BPF_RET] = "BUG", + [BPF_ALU64] = "alu64", +}; + +static const char *const bpf_alu_string[] = { + [BPF_ADD >> 4] = "+=", + [BPF_SUB >> 4] = "-=", + [BPF_MUL >> 4] = "*=", + [BPF_DIV >> 4] = "/=", + [BPF_OR >> 4] = "|=", + [BPF_AND >> 4] = "&=", + [BPF_LSH >> 4] = "<<=", + [BPF_RSH >> 4] = ">>=", + [BPF_NEG >> 4] = "neg", + [BPF_MOD >> 4] = "%=", + [BPF_XOR >> 4] = "^=", + [BPF_MOV >> 4] = "=", + [BPF_ARSH >> 4] = "s>>=", + [BPF_END >> 4] = "endian", +}; + +static const char *const bpf_ldst_string[] = { + [BPF_W >> 3] = "u32", + [BPF_H >> 3] = "u16", + [BPF_B >> 3] = "u8", + [BPF_DW >> 3] = "u64", +}; + +static const char *const bpf_jmp_string[] = { + [BPF_JA >> 4] = "jmp", + [BPF_JEQ >> 4] = "==", + [BPF_JGT >> 4] = ">", + [BPF_JGE >> 4] = ">=", + [BPF_JSET >> 4] = "&", + [BPF_JNE >> 4] = "!=", + [BPF_JSGT >> 4] = "s>", + [BPF_JSGE >> 4] = "s>=", + [BPF_CALL >> 4] = "call", + [BPF_EXIT >> 4] = "exit", +}; + +static void print_bpf_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn) +{ + u8 class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code); + + if (class == BPF_ALU || class == BPF_ALU64) { + if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) + verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %sr%d\n", + insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", + insn->dst_reg, + bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], + class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", + insn->src_reg); + else + verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %s%d\n", + insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", + insn->dst_reg, + bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], + class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", + insn->imm); + } else if (class == BPF_STX) { + if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM) + verbose("(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = r%d\n", + insn->code, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->dst_reg, + insn->off, insn->src_reg); + else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_XADD) + verbose("(%02x) lock *(%s *)(r%d %+d) += r%d\n", + insn->code, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->dst_reg, insn->off, + insn->src_reg); + else + verbose("BUG_%02x\n", insn->code); + } else if (class == BPF_ST) { + if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM) { + verbose("BUG_st_%02x\n", insn->code); + return; + } + verbose("(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = %d\n", + insn->code, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->dst_reg, + insn->off, insn->imm); + } else if (class == BPF_LDX) { + if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM) { + verbose("BUG_ldx_%02x\n", insn->code); + return; + } + verbose("(%02x) r%d = *(%s *)(r%d %+d)\n", + insn->code, insn->dst_reg, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->src_reg, insn->off); + } else if (class == BPF_LD) { + if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ABS) { + verbose("(%02x) r0 = *(%s *)skb[%d]\n", + insn->code, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->imm); + } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_IND) { + verbose("(%02x) r0 = *(%s *)skb[r%d + %d]\n", + insn->code, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->src_reg, insn->imm); + } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_IMM) { + verbose("(%02x) r%d = 0x%x\n", + insn->code, insn->dst_reg, insn->imm); + } else { + verbose("BUG_ld_%02x\n", insn->code); + return; + } + } else if (class == BPF_JMP) { + u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); + + if (opcode == BPF_CALL) { + verbose("(%02x) call %d\n", insn->code, insn->imm); + } else if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_JA)) { + verbose("(%02x) goto pc%+d\n", + insn->code, insn->off); + } else if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT)) { + verbose("(%02x) exit\n", insn->code); + } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { + verbose("(%02x) if r%d %s r%d goto pc%+d\n", + insn->code, insn->dst_reg, + bpf_jmp_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], + insn->src_reg, insn->off); + } else { + verbose("(%02x) if r%d %s 0x%x goto pc%+d\n", + insn->code, insn->dst_reg, + bpf_jmp_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], + insn->imm, insn->off); + } + } else { + verbose("(%02x) %s\n", insn->code, bpf_class_string[class]); + } +} + int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr) { + char __user *log_ubuf = NULL; + struct verifier_env *env; int ret = -EINVAL; + if (prog->len <= 0 || prog->len > BPF_MAXINSNS) + return -E2BIG; + + /* 'struct verifier_env' can be global, but since it's not small, + * allocate/free it every time bpf_check() is called + */ + env = kzalloc(sizeof(struct verifier_env), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!env) + return -ENOMEM; + + /* grab the mutex to protect few globals used by verifier */ + mutex_lock(&bpf_verifier_lock); + + if (attr->log_level || attr->log_buf || attr->log_size) { + /* user requested verbose verifier output + * and supplied buffer to store the verification trace + */ + log_level = attr->log_level; + log_ubuf = attr->log_buf; + log_size = attr->log_size; + log_len = 0; + + ret = -EINVAL; + /* log_* values have to be sane */ + if (log_size < 128 || log_size > UINT_MAX >> 8 || + log_level == 0 || log_ubuf == NULL) + goto free_env; + + ret = -ENOMEM; + log_buf = vmalloc(log_size); + if (!log_buf) + goto free_env; + } else { + log_level = 0; + } + + /* ret = do_check(env); */ + + if (log_level && log_len >= log_size - 1) { + BUG_ON(log_len >= log_size); + /* verifier log exceeded user supplied buffer */ + ret = -ENOSPC; + /* fall through to return what was recorded */ + } + + /* copy verifier log back to user space including trailing zero */ + if (log_level && copy_to_user(log_ubuf, log_buf, log_len + 1) != 0) { + ret = -EFAULT; + goto free_log_buf; + } + + +free_log_buf: + if (log_level) + vfree(log_buf); +free_env: + kfree(env); + mutex_unlock(&bpf_verifier_lock); return ret; } -- 1.7.9.5 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexei Starovoitov Subject: [PATCH v12 net-next 07/11] bpf: verifier (add ability to receive verification log) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:18:37 -0700 Message-ID: <1410808721-27493-8-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> References: <1410808721-27493-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Daniel Borkmann , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Chema Gonzalez , Eric Dumazet , Peter Zijlstra , Pablo Neira Ayuso , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "David S. Miller" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1410808721-27493-1-git-send-email-ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org add optional attributes for BPF_PROG_LOAD syscall: union bpf_attr { struct { ... __u32 log_level; /* verbosity level of eBPF verifier */ __u32 log_size; /* size of user buffer */ char __user *log_buf; /* user supplied buffer */ }; }; when log_level > 0 the verifier will return its verification log in the user supplied buffer 'log_buf' which can be used by program author to analyze why verifier rejected given program. 'Understanding eBPF verifier messages' section of Documentation/networking/filter.txt provides several examples of these messages, like the program: BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), BPF_CALL_FUNC(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 4, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), will be rejected with the following multi-line message in log_buf: 0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0 1: (bf) r2 = r10 2: (07) r2 += -8 3: (b7) r1 = 0 4: (85) call 1 5: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1 R0=map_ptr R10=fp 6: (7a) *(u64 *)(r0 +4) = 0 misaligned access off 4 size 8 The format of the output can change at any time as verifier evolves. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 + kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 +- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 235 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index a9d56d128b8c..a6331f2ccf93 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ union bpf_attr { __u32 insn_cnt; const struct bpf_insn __user *insns; const char __user *license; + __u32 log_level; /* verbosity level of eBPF verifier */ + __u32 log_size; /* size of user buffer */ + char __user *log_buf; /* user supplied buffer */ }; }; diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 10a50453d101..7c062a34c696 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get(u32 ufd) } /* last field in 'union bpf_attr' used by this command */ -#define BPF_PROG_LOAD_LAST_FIELD license +#define BPF_PROG_LOAD_LAST_FIELD log_buf static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr) { diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index d6f9c3d6b4d7..c721d1f4d3cc 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -125,9 +125,244 @@ * are set to NOT_INIT to indicate that they are no longer readable. */ +/* single container for all structs + * one verifier_env per bpf_check() call + */ +struct verifier_env { +}; + +/* verbose verifier prints what it's seeing + * bpf_check() is called under lock, so no race to access these global vars + */ +static u32 log_level, log_size, log_len; +static char *log_buf; + +static DEFINE_MUTEX(bpf_verifier_lock); + +/* log_level controls verbosity level of eBPF verifier. + * verbose() is used to dump the verification trace to the log, so the user + * can figure out what's wrong with the program + */ +static void verbose(const char *fmt, ...) +{ + va_list args; + + if (log_level == 0 || log_len >= log_size - 1) + return; + + va_start(args, fmt); + log_len += vscnprintf(log_buf + log_len, log_size - log_len, fmt, args); + va_end(args); +} + +static const char *const bpf_class_string[] = { + [BPF_LD] = "ld", + [BPF_LDX] = "ldx", + [BPF_ST] = "st", + [BPF_STX] = "stx", + [BPF_ALU] = "alu", + [BPF_JMP] = "jmp", + [BPF_RET] = "BUG", + [BPF_ALU64] = "alu64", +}; + +static const char *const bpf_alu_string[] = { + [BPF_ADD >> 4] = "+=", + [BPF_SUB >> 4] = "-=", + [BPF_MUL >> 4] = "*=", + [BPF_DIV >> 4] = "/=", + [BPF_OR >> 4] = "|=", + [BPF_AND >> 4] = "&=", + [BPF_LSH >> 4] = "<<=", + [BPF_RSH >> 4] = ">>=", + [BPF_NEG >> 4] = "neg", + [BPF_MOD >> 4] = "%=", + [BPF_XOR >> 4] = "^=", + [BPF_MOV >> 4] = "=", + [BPF_ARSH >> 4] = "s>>=", + [BPF_END >> 4] = "endian", +}; + +static const char *const bpf_ldst_string[] = { + [BPF_W >> 3] = "u32", + [BPF_H >> 3] = "u16", + [BPF_B >> 3] = "u8", + [BPF_DW >> 3] = "u64", +}; + +static const char *const bpf_jmp_string[] = { + [BPF_JA >> 4] = "jmp", + [BPF_JEQ >> 4] = "==", + [BPF_JGT >> 4] = ">", + [BPF_JGE >> 4] = ">=", + [BPF_JSET >> 4] = "&", + [BPF_JNE >> 4] = "!=", + [BPF_JSGT >> 4] = "s>", + [BPF_JSGE >> 4] = "s>=", + [BPF_CALL >> 4] = "call", + [BPF_EXIT >> 4] = "exit", +}; + +static void print_bpf_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn) +{ + u8 class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code); + + if (class == BPF_ALU || class == BPF_ALU64) { + if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) + verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %sr%d\n", + insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", + insn->dst_reg, + bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], + class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", + insn->src_reg); + else + verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %s%d\n", + insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", + insn->dst_reg, + bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], + class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", + insn->imm); + } else if (class == BPF_STX) { + if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM) + verbose("(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = r%d\n", + insn->code, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->dst_reg, + insn->off, insn->src_reg); + else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_XADD) + verbose("(%02x) lock *(%s *)(r%d %+d) += r%d\n", + insn->code, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->dst_reg, insn->off, + insn->src_reg); + else + verbose("BUG_%02x\n", insn->code); + } else if (class == BPF_ST) { + if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM) { + verbose("BUG_st_%02x\n", insn->code); + return; + } + verbose("(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = %d\n", + insn->code, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->dst_reg, + insn->off, insn->imm); + } else if (class == BPF_LDX) { + if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM) { + verbose("BUG_ldx_%02x\n", insn->code); + return; + } + verbose("(%02x) r%d = *(%s *)(r%d %+d)\n", + insn->code, insn->dst_reg, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->src_reg, insn->off); + } else if (class == BPF_LD) { + if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ABS) { + verbose("(%02x) r0 = *(%s *)skb[%d]\n", + insn->code, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->imm); + } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_IND) { + verbose("(%02x) r0 = *(%s *)skb[r%d + %d]\n", + insn->code, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->src_reg, insn->imm); + } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_IMM) { + verbose("(%02x) r%d = 0x%x\n", + insn->code, insn->dst_reg, insn->imm); + } else { + verbose("BUG_ld_%02x\n", insn->code); + return; + } + } else if (class == BPF_JMP) { + u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); + + if (opcode == BPF_CALL) { + verbose("(%02x) call %d\n", insn->code, insn->imm); + } else if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_JA)) { + verbose("(%02x) goto pc%+d\n", + insn->code, insn->off); + } else if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT)) { + verbose("(%02x) exit\n", insn->code); + } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { + verbose("(%02x) if r%d %s r%d goto pc%+d\n", + insn->code, insn->dst_reg, + bpf_jmp_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], + insn->src_reg, insn->off); + } else { + verbose("(%02x) if r%d %s 0x%x goto pc%+d\n", + insn->code, insn->dst_reg, + bpf_jmp_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], + insn->imm, insn->off); + } + } else { + verbose("(%02x) %s\n", insn->code, bpf_class_string[class]); + } +} + int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr) { + char __user *log_ubuf = NULL; + struct verifier_env *env; int ret = -EINVAL; + if (prog->len <= 0 || prog->len > BPF_MAXINSNS) + return -E2BIG; + + /* 'struct verifier_env' can be global, but since it's not small, + * allocate/free it every time bpf_check() is called + */ + env = kzalloc(sizeof(struct verifier_env), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!env) + return -ENOMEM; + + /* grab the mutex to protect few globals used by verifier */ + mutex_lock(&bpf_verifier_lock); + + if (attr->log_level || attr->log_buf || attr->log_size) { + /* user requested verbose verifier output + * and supplied buffer to store the verification trace + */ + log_level = attr->log_level; + log_ubuf = attr->log_buf; + log_size = attr->log_size; + log_len = 0; + + ret = -EINVAL; + /* log_* values have to be sane */ + if (log_size < 128 || log_size > UINT_MAX >> 8 || + log_level == 0 || log_ubuf == NULL) + goto free_env; + + ret = -ENOMEM; + log_buf = vmalloc(log_size); + if (!log_buf) + goto free_env; + } else { + log_level = 0; + } + + /* ret = do_check(env); */ + + if (log_level && log_len >= log_size - 1) { + BUG_ON(log_len >= log_size); + /* verifier log exceeded user supplied buffer */ + ret = -ENOSPC; + /* fall through to return what was recorded */ + } + + /* copy verifier log back to user space including trailing zero */ + if (log_level && copy_to_user(log_ubuf, log_buf, log_len + 1) != 0) { + ret = -EFAULT; + goto free_log_buf; + } + + +free_log_buf: + if (log_level) + vfree(log_buf); +free_env: + kfree(env); + mutex_unlock(&bpf_verifier_lock); return ret; } -- 1.7.9.5