From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 for 4.5 4/8] libxl: refactor libxl_get_memory_target Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:02:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1410894158.23505.30.camel@citrix.com> References: <1410861678-31428-1-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> <1410861678-31428-5-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1410861678-31428-5-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu Cc: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 11:01 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > -static int libxl__fill_dom0_memory_info(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t *target_memkb) > +static int libxl__fill_dom0_memory_info(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t *target_memkb, > + uint32_t *max_memkb) Looking at the callers I think you could have made this tolerate NULL too, since the callers don't all need both AFAICT. But regardless: Acked-by: Ian Campbell