From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755344AbaIVXu7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:50:59 -0400 Received: from mail-by2on0119.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.100.119]:6910 "EHLO na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753643AbaIVXu5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:50:57 -0400 Message-ID: <1411429840.13320.100.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] powerpc/msi: Improve IRQ bitmap allocator From: Scott Wood To: Laurentiu Tudor CC: Michael Neuling , , , , , , , , , , , Laurentiu Tudor Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:50:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <541FDD32.8020105@freescale.com> References: <1411028820-29933-1-git-send-email-mikey@neuling.org> <1411028820-29933-4-git-send-email-mikey@neuling.org> <1411157769.13320.74.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <1411157986.13320.75.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <541FDD32.8020105@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [2601:2:5800:3f7:2cb0:f9c5:c80d:2765] X-ClientProxiedBy: BN1PR02CA0022.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.141.56.22) To BY2PR0301MB0727.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.63.17) X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0727; X-Forefront-PRVS: 034215E98F X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(189002)(479174003)(199003)(377424004)(51704005)(24454002)(23676002)(93916002)(74502003)(81542003)(19580405001)(79102003)(92726001)(50986999)(83322001)(80022003)(88136002)(87976001)(77096002)(87286001)(89996001)(50226001)(92566001)(104166001)(10300001)(19580395003)(81342003)(76176999)(4396001)(74662003)(99396002)(86362001)(103116003)(102836001)(62966002)(15975445006)(95666004)(50466002)(101416001)(106356001)(90102001)(110136001)(21056001)(105586002)(42186005)(93886004)(85852003)(77982003)(83072002)(20776003)(76482002)(107046002)(31966008)(47776003)(77156001)(120916001)(97736003)(46102003)(33646002)(64706001)(85306004)(15202345003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0727;H:[IPv6:2601:2:5800:3f7:2cb0:f9c5:c80d:2765];FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:26 +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: > On 09/19/2014 11:19 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 15:16 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > >> On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 18:26 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote: > >>> From: Ian Munsie > >>> > >>> Currently msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs() will round up any IRQ allocation requests > >>> to the nearest power of 2. eg. ask for 5 IRQs and you'll get 8. This wastes a > >>> lot of IRQs which can be a scarce resource. > >>> > >>> For cxl we can require multiple IRQs for every contexts that is attached to the > >>> accelerator. For AFU directed accelerators, there may be 1000s of contexts > >>> attached, hence we can easily run out of IRQs, especially if we are needlessly > >>> wasting them. > >>> > >>> This changes the msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs() to allocate only the required number > >>> of IRQs, hence avoiding this wastage. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie > >>> Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling > >>> --- > >>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- > >>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >> > >> This conflicts with (and partially duplicates) > >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/381892/ > >> which I have in my tree. How should we handle it? > >> > >> Laurentiu, from looking at the overlap between patches I see a problem > >> with your existing patch, regarding the out-of-irqs path and > >> msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs(), so one way or another that needs to get fixed > >> soon. > > > > Given the problems with Laurentiu's patch, perhaps it'd be best for me > > to just revert that patch in my tree, and respin it after this patchset > > has been merged. > > Let me know if you want me to rebase my stuff on top of Michael's patch. Yes, please resend it once Michael's patch gets merged. -Scott From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9CC21A041C for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:22:57 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1411429840.13320.100.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] powerpc/msi: Improve IRQ bitmap allocator From: Scott Wood To: Laurentiu Tudor Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:50:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <541FDD32.8020105@freescale.com> References: <1411028820-29933-1-git-send-email-mikey@neuling.org> <1411028820-29933-4-git-send-email-mikey@neuling.org> <1411157769.13320.74.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <1411157986.13320.75.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <541FDD32.8020105@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Michael Neuling , arnd@arndb.de, greg@kroah.com, imunsie@au.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Laurentiu Tudor , anton@samba.org, jk@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:26 +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: > On 09/19/2014 11:19 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 15:16 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > >> On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 18:26 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote: > >>> From: Ian Munsie > >>> > >>> Currently msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs() will round up any IRQ allocation requests > >>> to the nearest power of 2. eg. ask for 5 IRQs and you'll get 8. This wastes a > >>> lot of IRQs which can be a scarce resource. > >>> > >>> For cxl we can require multiple IRQs for every contexts that is attached to the > >>> accelerator. For AFU directed accelerators, there may be 1000s of contexts > >>> attached, hence we can easily run out of IRQs, especially if we are needlessly > >>> wasting them. > >>> > >>> This changes the msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs() to allocate only the required number > >>> of IRQs, hence avoiding this wastage. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie > >>> Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling > >>> --- > >>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- > >>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >> > >> This conflicts with (and partially duplicates) > >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/381892/ > >> which I have in my tree. How should we handle it? > >> > >> Laurentiu, from looking at the overlap between patches I see a problem > >> with your existing patch, regarding the out-of-irqs path and > >> msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs(), so one way or another that needs to get fixed > >> soon. > > > > Given the problems with Laurentiu's patch, perhaps it'd be best for me > > to just revert that patch in my tree, and respin it after this patchset > > has been merged. > > Let me know if you want me to rebase my stuff on top of Michael's patch. Yes, please resend it once Michael's patch gets merged. -Scott