From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759798AbaJ3Rxe (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:53:34 -0400 Received: from benson.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([212.110.190.137]:47114 "EHLO benson.vm.bytemark.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754161AbaJ3Rxc (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:53:32 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1985 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:53:31 EDT Message-ID: <1414689620.11523.5.camel@hellion.org.uk> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: Fix up /proc/cpuinfo From: Ian Campbell To: Will Deacon Cc: Mark Rutland , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Catalin Marinas , "ghackmann@google.com" , Serban Constantinescu , "cross-distro@lists.linaro.org" , "linux-api@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:20:20 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20141030171521.GL32589@arm.com> References: <1414159000-27059-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <1414159000-27059-2-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20141030171521.GL32589@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 17:15 +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:56:40PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Commit d7a49086f263164a (arm64: cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs) > > attempted to clean up /proc/cpuinfo, but due to concerns regarding > > further changes was reverted in commit 5e39977edf6500fd (Revert "arm64: > > cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs"). > > I've applied this on our devel branch, with a view to queuing it for -next > in a week or two. I think we should also CC stable on this, so could you > see how far back it applies please? (note that I already had to resolve > a conflict with a patch we've got queued from Ard). Since we'll be shipping 3.16 in our next release I'd love to see it go back at least as far as that ;-) (I'd likely apply it myself even if it doesn't appear via stable). Ian. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: Fix up /proc/cpuinfo Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:20:20 +0000 Message-ID: <1414689620.11523.5.camel@hellion.org.uk> References: <1414159000-27059-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <1414159000-27059-2-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20141030171521.GL32589@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141030171521.GL32589-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cross-distro-bounces-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org Sender: cross-distro-bounces-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org To: Will Deacon Cc: "cross-distro-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org" , Catalin Marinas , Serban Constantinescu , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "ghackmann-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 17:15 +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:56:40PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Commit d7a49086f263164a (arm64: cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs) > > attempted to clean up /proc/cpuinfo, but due to concerns regarding > > further changes was reverted in commit 5e39977edf6500fd (Revert "arm64: > > cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs"). > > I've applied this on our devel branch, with a view to queuing it for -next > in a week or two. I think we should also CC stable on this, so could you > see how far back it applies please? (note that I already had to resolve > a conflict with a patch we've got queued from Ard). Since we'll be shipping 3.16 in our next release I'd love to see it go back at least as far as that ;-) (I'd likely apply it myself even if it doesn't appear via stable). Ian. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ijc@hellion.org.uk (Ian Campbell) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:20:20 +0000 Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: Fix up /proc/cpuinfo In-Reply-To: <20141030171521.GL32589@arm.com> References: <1414159000-27059-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <1414159000-27059-2-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20141030171521.GL32589@arm.com> Message-ID: <1414689620.11523.5.camel@hellion.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 17:15 +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:56:40PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Commit d7a49086f263164a (arm64: cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs) > > attempted to clean up /proc/cpuinfo, but due to concerns regarding > > further changes was reverted in commit 5e39977edf6500fd (Revert "arm64: > > cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs"). > > I've applied this on our devel branch, with a view to queuing it for -next > in a week or two. I think we should also CC stable on this, so could you > see how far back it applies please? (note that I already had to resolve > a conflict with a patch we've got queued from Ard). Since we'll be shipping 3.16 in our next release I'd love to see it go back at least as far as that ;-) (I'd likely apply it myself even if it doesn't appear via stable). Ian.