From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Balakrishna Godavarthi Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Fix frame reassembly errors for wcn3990 Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 17:10:43 +0530 Message-ID: <1416876730c5e097fa084f5c7571db6e@codeaurora.org> References: <20181106120528.30342-1-bgodavar@codeaurora.org> <20181106120528.30342-5-bgodavar@codeaurora.org> <20181114193620.GJ22824@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181114193620.GJ22824@google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matthias Kaehlcke Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, hemantg@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Hi Matthias, On 2018-11-15 01:06, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:35:28PM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote: >> [ 176.929612] Bluetooth: hci_qca.c:qca_recv() hci0: Frame reassembly >> failed (-84) >> [ 176.945734] Bluetooth: hci_qca.c:qca_recv() hci0: Frame reassembly >> failed (-84) >> [ 176.953298] Bluetooth: hci_qca.c:qca_recv() hci0: Frame reassembly >> failed (-84) >> [ 177.010660] Bluetooth: hci_qca.c:qca_recv() hci0: Frame reassembly >> failed (-84) >> [ 177.067633] Bluetooth: hci_qca.c:qca_recv() hci0: Frame reassembly >> failed (-84) >> >> The above errors log on console due to receiving of stray bytes >> when wcn3990 boot up's i.e. when during initial setup procedure. > > Please shortly introduce the topic instead of starting with the log > messages. > [Bala]: will update. >> Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi >> --- >> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c >> index 97b57e0f4725..341f80606574 100644 >> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c >> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c >> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ >> >> /* Controller states */ >> #define STATE_IN_BAND_SLEEP_ENABLED 1 >> +#define STATE_DISCARD_RX 2 >> >> #define IBS_WAKE_RETRANS_TIMEOUT_MS 100 >> #define IBS_TX_IDLE_TIMEOUT_MS 2000 >> @@ -511,6 +512,7 @@ static int qca_open(struct hci_uart *hu) >> } else { >> hu->init_speed = qcadev->init_speed; >> hu->oper_speed = qcadev->oper_speed; >> + set_bit(STATE_DISCARD_RX, &qca->flags); >> ret = qca_power_setup(hu, true); >> if (ret) { >> destroy_workqueue(qca->workqueue); >> @@ -903,6 +905,13 @@ static int qca_recv(struct hci_uart *hu, const >> void *data, int count) >> if (!test_bit(HCI_UART_REGISTERED, &hu->flags)) >> return -EUNATCH; >> >> + /* We discard Rx data received while device is in booting >> + * stage, this is due multiple baudrate switch is causing >> + * UART to read some garbage data. >> + */ > > This isn't entirely correct. I saw frame reassembly errors before > qca_wcn3990_init() is called, i.e. no baudrate changes. Some of the > garbage seems to be sent shortly after powering on the controller. > [Bala]: yes your correct, will update the comment. >> + if (test_bit(STATE_DISCARD_RX, &qca->flags)) >> + return 0; >> + >> qca->rx_skb = h4_recv_buf(hu->hdev, qca->rx_skb, data, count, >> qca_recv_pkts, ARRAY_SIZE(qca_recv_pkts)); >> if (IS_ERR(qca->rx_skb)) { >> @@ -1192,10 +1201,12 @@ static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu) >> set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_USE_BDADDR_PROPERTY, &hdev->quirks); >> clear_bit(HCI_QUIRK_RESET_ON_CLOSE, &hdev->quirks); >> hu->hdev->shutdown = qca_power_off; >> + >> ret = qca_wcn3990_init(hu); >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> + clear_bit(STATE_DISCARD_RX, &qca->flags); >> ret = qca_read_soc_version(hdev, &soc_ver); >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> @@ -1278,8 +1289,15 @@ static void qca_power_shutdown(struct hci_uart >> *hu) >> struct serdev_device *serdev = hu->serdev; >> unsigned char cmd = QCA_WCN3990_POWEROFF_PULSE; >> >> - host_set_baudrate(hu, 2400); >> + /* From this point we go into power off state, >> + * disable IBS and discard all the queued data. >> + */ >> + clear_bit(STATE_IN_BAND_SLEEP_ENABLED, &qca->flags); >> + set_bit(STATE_DISCARD_RX, &qca->flags); >> + qca_flush(hu); >> + >> hci_uart_set_flow_control(hu, true); >> + host_set_baudrate(hu, 2400); >> serdev_device_write(serdev, &cmd, sizeof(cmd), 0); >> serdev_device_wait_until_sent(serdev, 0); >> hci_uart_set_flow_control(hu, false); > > This change won't win a beauty price, but it seems it is needed to > suppress the 'frame reassembly' spam, unless the controller can be > convinced to stop sending garbage in the first place. > [Bala]: This is due to serdev_open function call before we trun on the regulators. where we don't have control over serdev open and close calls. > Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke [Bala]: Thanks for testing. -- Regards Balakrishna.