From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dac.override@gmail.com (Dominick Grift)
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 15:33:30 +0100
Subject: [refpolicy] Syntax fixes in contrib
In-Reply-To: <547ED76D.5010709@redhat.com>
References: <1416983956-8770-1-git-send-email-jason@perfinion.com>
	<547DDB5A.3000307@tresys.com> <20141202161542.GA16393@e145.network2>
	<547ED76D.5010709@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1417617210.29096.4.camel@joe.localdomain>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 10:27 +0100, Miroslav Grepl wrote:

> > > > 
> > The problem with the admin interfaces (any interfaces for that matter) is that unless they are called they aren't tested.
> > 
> > This is also one of the reasons why i prefer only adding interfaces that are actually used.
> > 
> > On that other hand, adding interfaces even if they aren't used does make sense for audit2allow/sepolgen-ifgen, and for the confined admin support
> > 
> > 


> We have tests for testing these _admin() interfaces in RHEL. I believe
> we could add them to Fedora to have them available.

Could be interesting. I fear however that the tests aren't going to be
the problem, but rather running them consistently when a unused
interface is added.

I might be wrong with that assumption though