From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751952AbaLRCOt (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 21:14:49 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0107.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.107]:51942 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751889AbaLRCOq (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 21:14:46 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:960:968:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3871:3872:4250:4321:4419:4605:5007:6261:10004:10400:10848:11026:11232:11473:11657:11658:11914:12043:12296:12438:12517:12519:12740:13069:13161:13229:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: boats75_8087f24f9f545 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2865 Message-ID: <1418868881.28384.8.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Input: touchscreen-iproc: Add Broadcom iProc touchscreen driver From: Joe Perches To: Jonathan Richardson Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Ray Jui , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 18:14:41 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1418867992-3550-2-git-send-email-jonathar@broadcom.com> References: <1418867992-3550-1-git-send-email-jonathar@broadcom.com> <1418867992-3550-2-git-send-email-jonathar@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 17:59 -0800, Jonathan Richardson wrote: > Add initial version of the Broadcom touchscreen driver. trivia: > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/bcm_iproc_tsc.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/bcm_iproc_tsc.c > +/* Bit values for REGCTL2 */ > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_EN_BIT (1 << 16) > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_AVGDATA_SHIFT 8 > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_AVGDATA_MASK (0x7 << TS_CONTROLLER_AVGDATA_SHIFT) > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_PWR_LDO (1<<5) > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_PWR_ADC (1<<4) > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_PWR_BGP (1<<3) > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_PWR_TS (1<<2) > +#define TS_WIRE_MODE_BIT (1<<1) Be nicer to use the same spacing around << or maybe use the BIT macro. [] > +static int get_tsc_config(struct device_node *np, struct iproc_ts_priv *priv) > +{ > + int ret; > + u32 val; > + struct device *dev = &priv->pdev->dev; > + > + priv->cfg_params = default_config; > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "scanning_period", &val); > + if (ret >= 0) { > + if ((1 <= val) && (val <= 256)) > + priv->cfg_params.scanning_period = val; > + else { > + dev_err(dev, "scanning_period must be [1-256]"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } ret is never used so I'd probably remove it from all these blocks. It's probably be nicer to invert the logic ald remove the else. There's a missing terminating newline too. Something like: if (of_property_read_u32(np, "scanning_period", &val) >= 0) { if (val < 1 || val > 256) { dev_err(dev, "scanning_period must be [1-256]\n"); return -EINVAL; } priv->cfg_params.scanning_period = val; } etc... From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 18:14:41 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Input: touchscreen-iproc: Add Broadcom iProc touchscreen driver In-Reply-To: <1418867992-3550-2-git-send-email-jonathar@broadcom.com> References: <1418867992-3550-1-git-send-email-jonathar@broadcom.com> <1418867992-3550-2-git-send-email-jonathar@broadcom.com> Message-ID: <1418868881.28384.8.camel@perches.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 17:59 -0800, Jonathan Richardson wrote: > Add initial version of the Broadcom touchscreen driver. trivia: > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/bcm_iproc_tsc.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/bcm_iproc_tsc.c > +/* Bit values for REGCTL2 */ > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_EN_BIT (1 << 16) > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_AVGDATA_SHIFT 8 > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_AVGDATA_MASK (0x7 << TS_CONTROLLER_AVGDATA_SHIFT) > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_PWR_LDO (1<<5) > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_PWR_ADC (1<<4) > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_PWR_BGP (1<<3) > +#define TS_CONTROLLER_PWR_TS (1<<2) > +#define TS_WIRE_MODE_BIT (1<<1) Be nicer to use the same spacing around << or maybe use the BIT macro. [] > +static int get_tsc_config(struct device_node *np, struct iproc_ts_priv *priv) > +{ > + int ret; > + u32 val; > + struct device *dev = &priv->pdev->dev; > + > + priv->cfg_params = default_config; > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "scanning_period", &val); > + if (ret >= 0) { > + if ((1 <= val) && (val <= 256)) > + priv->cfg_params.scanning_period = val; > + else { > + dev_err(dev, "scanning_period must be [1-256]"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } ret is never used so I'd probably remove it from all these blocks. It's probably be nicer to invert the logic ald remove the else. There's a missing terminating newline too. Something like: if (of_property_read_u32(np, "scanning_period", &val) >= 0) { if (val < 1 || val > 256) { dev_err(dev, "scanning_period must be [1-256]\n"); return -EINVAL; } priv->cfg_params.scanning_period = val; } etc...