From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Frederic Sowa Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: add IPv4 routing FIB support for swdev Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 21:26:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1420576016.15181.21.camel@redhat.com> References: <1420169361-31767-2-git-send-email-sfeldma@gmail.com> <1420552709.32369.50.camel@stressinduktion.org> <1420574353.15181.19.camel@stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netdev , =?UTF-8?Q?Ji=C5=99=C3=AD_P=C3=ADrko?= , john fastabend , Thomas Graf , Jamal Hadi Salim , Andy Gospodarek , Roopa Prabhu To: Scott Feldman Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42607 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753567AbbAFU1f (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2015 15:27:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1420574353.15181.19.camel@stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Di, 2015-01-06 at 20:59 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > Sorry, I haven't fully understood this. Does rocker first do a L3 > routing table lookup and *after* that does decide which nexthop to chose > based on preferences in the action-set found at the leaf? My gut tells > me that we cannot do a semantically equivalent to ip rules then, we > would have to use ACLs then. Hmm... Does rocker drop the packet if no match is found or can it pass the packet onto the slowpath to the kernel?