All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Yogesh Ahire <yogesh02061983@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sched_yield() call on Linux Kernel 2.6.39 is not behaving correct
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 06:26:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420694794.5279.33.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH86sKKCbZ7CYDEgAnpiVH+7TZNOjziUYOJSWHEpQyY3eUSniA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 16:30 -0500, Yogesh Ahire wrote: 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have a system with multiple CPU cores.  I have multiple threads
> assigned to particular CPU. Among these threads the main thread calls
> sched_yield() if it has nothing to do, I am hoping that doing so will
> give chance to other threads to run. But the strange behavior of
> sched_yield() is , even if there are ready-to-runs tasks on this CPU
> waiting for their turn, the task which calls sched_yield() is always
> running ( get scheduled) and not giving chance to any other task to
> run. It is consuming 100% of CPU. Is sched_yield() is broken on 2.6
> Kernel?

Nope, your expectation is likely busted.  sched_yield() for a fair class
task is merely a resched check in CFS.  IFF there's a runnable task
that's more deserving by the CFS definition thereof, it'll initiate a
context switch, otherwise it's a non-free noop.  For realtime class
tasks, behavior is predictable, the scheduler WILL initiate a context
switch IFF there is a runnable task of >= yielding tasks priority on the
same CPU.  If you depend on a context switch happening in any other
circumstance, you're gonna be seriously disappointed.

-Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-08  5:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-07 21:30 sched_yield() call on Linux Kernel 2.6.39 is not behaving correct Yogesh Ahire
2015-01-08  5:26 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2015-01-08 15:00   ` Yogesh Ahire
2015-01-09  3:14     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-01-09 19:24       ` Yogesh Ahire
2015-01-10  7:37         ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1420694794.5279.33.camel@marge.simpson.net \
    --to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yogesh02061983@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.