From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: QEMU 2.2.0 in Xen 4.6 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 14:55:10 +0000 Message-ID: <1422024910.19859.82.camel@citrix.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Eric Shelton List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 14:42 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > HVM guest ---------(PV)----------> QEMU in Dom0 for guest > | > --(emulation)--> QEMU Stubdom-(syscall)->Linux Stubdom---(PV)--> QEMU Dom0 for stubdom Here, and throughout what you said I think, "QEMU in Dom0 for guest" could equally well be e.g. "blkback in driver domain for guest" likewise the "... for stubdom" too. i.e. the PV backend for the stubdom or the guest doesn't necessarily need to be QEMU and doesn't necessarily need to be in dom0. Ian.