From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] i2c-designware-baytrail: fix typo in error path Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:06:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1424772381.14897.20.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1423587970-19136-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1423587970-19136-2-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20150211164611.GA2712@katana> <1424696051.14897.13.camel@linux.intel.com> <20150223184223.GA14109@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150223184223.GA14109@katana> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Mika Westerberg , David Box , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jarkko Nikula List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 19:42 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Shouldn't the latter be a dev_dbg? > > > > Wolfram, do we agree on this as states in the patch? Maybe you have more > > comments, questions? > > Yes, it is fine this way. > > > Otherwise, should I rebase this on top of 4.0-rc1 or you will be okay > > with current version? > > Well, if it needs rebasing, please do. If not, please say so, too :) It applies clearly on top of current linux-next without any changes from my side. So, no rebase is needed. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy