From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] net: use skb->priority for overloading skb->dropcount and skb->reserved_tailroom instead of skb->mark Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:50:28 -0800 Message-ID: <1424883028.5565.89.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> References: <1424713924-6821-2-git-send-email-eyal.birger@gmail.com> <1424713924-6821-4-git-send-email-eyal.birger@gmail.com> <20150223205633.7fbd08d4@halley> <20150223.164801.842537100812023841.davem@davemloft.net> <1424783915.5565.74.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , Shmulik Ladkani , Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eyal Birger Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com ([209.85.213.176]:61329 "EHLO mail-ig0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752120AbbBYQub (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:50:31 -0500 Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hl2so37062283igb.3 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:50:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 16:10 +0200, Eyal Birger wrote: > Would you prefer this approach? This looks fine to me.