All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	bobby.prani@gmail.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/20] rcu: Rework preemptible expedited bitmask handling
Date: Tue,  3 Mar 2015 09:43:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425404595-17816-13-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425404595-17816-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Currently, the rcu_node tree ->expmask bitmasks are initially set to
reflect the online CPUs.  This is pointless, because only the CPUs
preempted within RCU read-side critical sections by the preceding
synchronize_sched_expedited() need to be tracked.  This commit therefore
instead sets up these bitmasks based on the state of the ->blkd_tasks
lists.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 79376e2461c9..ce8fb810770c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -98,8 +98,7 @@ RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_preempt, 'p', call_rcu);
 static struct rcu_state *rcu_state_p = &rcu_preempt_state;
 
 static int rcu_preempted_readers_exp(struct rcu_node *rnp);
-static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
-			       bool wake);
+static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp);
 
 /*
  * Tell them what RCU they are running.
@@ -415,7 +414,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
 		 * then we need to report up the rcu_node hierarchy.
 		 */
 		if (!empty_exp && empty_exp_now)
-			rcu_report_exp_rnp(&rcu_preempt_state, rnp, true);
+			rcu_report_exp_rnp(&rcu_preempt_state, rnp);
 	} else {
 		local_irq_restore(flags);
 	}
@@ -626,13 +625,9 @@ static int sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(struct rcu_node *rnp)
  * recursively up the tree.  (Calm down, calm down, we do the recursion
  * iteratively!)
  *
- * Most callers will set the "wake" flag, but the task initiating the
- * expedited grace period need not wake itself.
- *
  * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
  */
-static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
-			       bool wake)
+static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned long mask;
@@ -646,10 +641,8 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
 		}
 		if (rnp->parent == NULL) {
 			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
-			if (wake) {
-				smp_mb(); /* EGP done before wake_up(). */
-				wake_up(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq);
-			}
+			smp_mb(); /* EGP done before wake_up(). */
+			wake_up(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq);
 			break;
 		}
 		mask = rnp->grpmask;
@@ -663,8 +656,11 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
 
 /*
  * Snapshot the tasks blocking the newly started preemptible-RCU expedited
- * grace period for the specified rcu_node structure.  If there are no such
- * tasks, report it up the rcu_node hierarchy.
+ * grace period for the specified rcu_node structure.  If there are such
+ * tasks, set the ->exp_mask bits up the rcu_node tree.  Note that we
+ * do not set the ->exp_mask bits on the leaf rcu_node structures, because:
+ * (1) No particular CPU is blocking us and (2) A non-NULL ->exp_tasks
+ * pointer tells us that a given leaf rcu_node is blocked by some tasks.
  *
  * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex and must exclude
  * CPU hotplug operations.
@@ -673,14 +669,27 @@ static void
 sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned long mask;
+	struct rcu_node *rnp_up;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
 	smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
 	if (!rcu_preempt_has_tasks(rnp)) {
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
-		rcu_report_exp_rnp(rsp, rnp, false); /* No tasks, report. */
 	} else {
+		/* Propagate ->expmask bits up the rcu_node tree. */
 		rnp->exp_tasks = rnp->blkd_tasks.next;
+		rnp_up = rnp;
+		while (rnp_up->parent) {
+			mask = rnp_up->grpmask;
+			rnp_up = rnp_up->parent;
+			if (ACCESS_ONCE(rnp_up->expmask) & mask)
+				break;
+			raw_spin_lock(&rnp_up->lock); /* irqs already off */
+			smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+			rnp_up->expmask |= mask;
+			raw_spin_unlock(&rnp_up->lock); /* irqs still off */
+		}
 		rcu_initiate_boost(rnp, flags);  /* releases rnp->lock */
 	}
 }
@@ -699,7 +708,6 @@ sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
  */
 void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 	struct rcu_state *rsp = &rcu_preempt_state;
 	unsigned long snap;
@@ -750,13 +758,9 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 	/* force all RCU readers onto ->blkd_tasks lists. */
 	synchronize_sched_expedited();
 
-	/* Initialize ->expmask for all non-leaf rcu_node structures. */
-	rcu_for_each_nonleaf_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
-		smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
-		rnp->expmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
-	}
+	/* Check initial state.  Later under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU. */
+	rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp)
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->expmask);
 
 	/* Snapshot current state of ->blkd_tasks lists. */
 	rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rsp, rnp)
-- 
1.8.1.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-03 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-03 17:41 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/20] CPU hotplug updates for v4.1 Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:42 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/20] smpboot: Add common code for notification from dying CPU Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:42   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/20] x86: Use common outgoing-CPU-notification code Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 19:17     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-03 19:42       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 19:42       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 20:13         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-03 20:13         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-03 21:26           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 22:06             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-03 22:31               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 22:31               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-04 14:43                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-04 14:43                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-04 14:55                   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-04 14:55                   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-04 15:25                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-05 21:17                       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-05 21:17                       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-05 22:00                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-05 22:00                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-04 15:25                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-04 15:45                     ` David Vrabel
2015-03-04 15:45                     ` David Vrabel
2015-03-04 16:10                       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-04 16:10                       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-03 22:06             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-03 21:26           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 19:17     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-03 17:42   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/20] blackfin: " Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/20] metag: " Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:42     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-10 15:30     ` James Hogan
2015-03-10 15:30       ` James Hogan
2015-03-10 16:59       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-11 11:03         ` James Hogan
2015-03-11 11:03           ` James Hogan
2015-03-11 18:58           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-11 18:58             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/20] rcu: Consolidate offline-CPU callback initialization Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/20] rcu: Put all orphan-callback-related code under same comment Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/20] rcu: Simplify sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init() Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/20] rcu: Eliminate empty HOTPLUG_CPU ifdef Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/20] rcu: Detect stalls caused by failure to propagate up rcu_node tree Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/20] rcu: Provide diagnostic option to slow down grace-period initialization Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-04 10:54     ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-04 14:59       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/20] rcutorture: Enable slow grace-period initializations Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/20] rcu: Remove event tracing from rcu_cpu_notify(), used by offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/20] rcu: Move rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() to common code Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/20] rcu: Process offlining and onlining only at grace-period start Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/20] rcu: Eliminate ->onoff_mutex from rcu_node structure Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/20] cpu: Make CPU-offline idle-loop transition point more precise Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/20] rcu: Handle outgoing CPUs on exit from idle loop Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/20] rcutorture: Default to grace-period-initialization delays Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/20] rcu: Add diagnostics to grace-period cleanup Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1425404595-17816-13-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.