From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rafael David Tinoco <inaddy@ubuntu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: smp_call_function_single lockups
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 18:14:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426871675.3356.7.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFycvNk7YSLLZJX1VNuVsDz+siLaNM4JHYCMCrSqXv41xQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 09:26 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Linus, any plans for this patch? I think it does solve a fair few issues
> > the current code has.
>
> So I didn't really have any plans. I think it's a good patch, and it
> might even fix a bug and improve code generation, but it didn't fix
> the lockup problem, so..
>
> > do you want me to route it through tip (and write a changelog while I'm
> > at it) or will you be taking it yourself?
>
> If you think it's worth committing, then go ahead. Add my signed-off,
> although I have to note that I didn't do a lot of testing of that
> patch (I think it was compile-tested when I sent it out, and then I
> ended up running it for a while, and obviously it got *some* testing
> by the person who saw the lockup that just showed that it didn't fix
> the problem ;(
I carried it for a while on boxen big and small, so it got some burn-in.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-20 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-11 13:19 smp_call_function_single lockups Rafael David Tinoco
2015-02-11 18:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-11 19:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-11 20:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-12 16:38 ` Rafael David Tinoco
2015-02-18 22:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19 15:42 ` Rafael David Tinoco
2015-02-19 16:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-23 14:01 ` Rafael David Tinoco
2015-02-23 19:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-23 20:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-23 21:02 ` Rafael David Tinoco
2015-02-19 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19 16:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-19 16:32 ` Rafael David Tinoco
2015-02-19 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-19 17:30 ` Rafael David Tinoco
2015-02-19 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-19 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-19 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-19 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-31 3:15 ` Chris J Arges
2015-03-31 4:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-31 10:56 ` [debug PATCHes] " Ingo Molnar
2015-03-31 22:38 ` Chris J Arges
2015-04-01 12:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-01 14:10 ` Chris J Arges
2015-04-01 14:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-31 4:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-31 15:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-31 22:23 ` Chris J Arges
2015-03-31 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-01 14:32 ` Chris J Arges
2015-04-01 15:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-02 9:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-02 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-01 12:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-01 16:10 ` Chris J Arges
2015-04-01 16:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-01 21:59 ` Chris J Arges
2015-04-02 17:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-02 18:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-02 18:51 ` Chris J Arges
2015-04-02 19:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-02 20:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-02 21:13 ` Chris J Arges
2015-04-03 5:43 ` [PATCH] smp/call: Detect stuck CSD locks Ingo Molnar
2015-04-03 5:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-06 16:58 ` Chris J Arges
2015-04-06 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-07 9:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-07 20:59 ` Chris J Arges
2015-04-07 21:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-08 6:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-13 3:56 ` Chris J Arges
2015-04-13 6:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-15 19:54 ` Chris J Arges
2015-04-16 11:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-16 15:58 ` Chris J Arges
2015-04-16 16:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-29 21:08 ` Chris J Arges
2015-05-11 14:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-20 18:19 ` Chris J Arges
2015-04-03 5:45 ` smp_call_function_single lockups Ingo Molnar
2015-04-06 17:23 ` Chris J Arges
2015-02-20 9:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-20 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-20 19:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-20 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-20 20:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-20 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-20 16:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-20 17:14 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2015-04-01 14:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-04-18 10:13 ` [tip:locking/urgent] smp: Fix smp_call_function_single_async() locking tip-bot for Linus Torvalds
2015-02-22 8:59 smp_call_function_single lockups Daniel J Blueman
2015-02-22 10:37 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1426871675.3356.7.camel@gmail.com \
--to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=inaddy@ubuntu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.