From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753324AbbCWFIM (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 01:08:12 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f53.google.com ([209.85.192.53]:33388 "EHLO mail-qg0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753263AbbCWFII (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 01:08:08 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: axboe@kernel.dk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@suse.cz, clm@fb.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com, david@fromorbit.com, gthelen@google.com, Tejun Heo Subject: [PATCH 08/18] writeback: add dirty_throttle_control->pos_ratio Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 01:07:37 -0400 Message-Id: <1427087267-16592-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.0 In-Reply-To: <1427087267-16592-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> References: <1427087267-16592-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org wb_position_ratio() is used to calculate pos_ratio, which is used for two purposes. wb_update_dirty_ratelimit() uses it to adjust wb->[balanced_]dirty_ratelimit gradually and balance_dirty_pages() to immediately adjust dirty_ratelimit right before applying it to determine pause duration. While wb_update_dirty_ratelimit() is separately rate limited from balance_dirty_pages(), on the run where the ratelimit is updated, we end up calculating pos_ratio twice with the same parameters. This patch adds dirty_throttle_control->pos_ratio. balance_dirty_pages() calculates it once per run and wb_update_dirty_ratelimit() uses the value stored in dirty_throttle_control. This removes the duplicate calculation and also will help implementing memcg wb_domain. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Jens Axboe Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Wu Fengguang Cc: Greg Thelen --- mm/page-writeback.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index a4b6dab..ac2d7b1 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ struct dirty_throttle_control { unsigned long wb_dirty; /* per-wb counterparts */ unsigned long wb_thresh; unsigned long wb_bg_thresh; + + unsigned long pos_ratio; }; #define GDTC_INIT(__wb) .wb = (__wb) @@ -717,7 +719,7 @@ static long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint, * card's wb_dirty may rush to many times higher than wb_setpoint. * - the wb dirty thresh drops quickly due to change of JBOD workload */ -static unsigned long wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc) +static void wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc) { struct bdi_writeback *wb = dtc->wb; unsigned long write_bw = wb->avg_write_bandwidth; @@ -731,8 +733,10 @@ static unsigned long wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc) long long pos_ratio; /* for scaling up/down the rate limit */ long x; + dtc->pos_ratio = 0; + if (unlikely(dtc->dirty >= limit)) - return 0; + return; /* * global setpoint @@ -770,18 +774,20 @@ static unsigned long wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc) if (unlikely(wb->bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT)) { long long wb_pos_ratio; - if (dtc->wb_dirty < 8) - return min_t(long long, pos_ratio * 2, - 2 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT); + if (dtc->wb_dirty < 8) { + dtc->pos_ratio = min_t(long long, pos_ratio * 2, + 2 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT); + return; + } if (dtc->wb_dirty >= wb_thresh) - return 0; + return; wb_setpoint = dirty_freerun_ceiling(wb_thresh, dtc->wb_bg_thresh); if (wb_setpoint == 0 || wb_setpoint == wb_thresh) - return 0; + return; wb_pos_ratio = pos_ratio_polynom(wb_setpoint, dtc->wb_dirty, wb_thresh); @@ -807,7 +813,8 @@ static unsigned long wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc) * is 2. We might want to tweak this if we observe the control * system is too slow to adapt. */ - return min(pos_ratio, wb_pos_ratio); + dtc->pos_ratio = min(pos_ratio, wb_pos_ratio); + return; } /* @@ -888,7 +895,7 @@ static unsigned long wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc) pos_ratio *= 8; } - return pos_ratio; + dtc->pos_ratio = pos_ratio; } static void wb_update_write_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb, @@ -1009,7 +1016,6 @@ static void wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc, unsigned long dirty_rate; unsigned long task_ratelimit; unsigned long balanced_dirty_ratelimit; - unsigned long pos_ratio; unsigned long step; unsigned long x; @@ -1019,12 +1025,11 @@ static void wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc, */ dirty_rate = (dirtied - wb->dirtied_stamp) * HZ / elapsed; - pos_ratio = wb_position_ratio(dtc); /* * task_ratelimit reflects each dd's dirty rate for the past 200ms. */ task_ratelimit = (u64)dirty_ratelimit * - pos_ratio >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT; + dtc->pos_ratio >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT; task_ratelimit++; /* it helps rampup dirty_ratelimit from tiny values */ /* @@ -1375,7 +1380,6 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping, bool dirty_exceeded = false; unsigned long task_ratelimit; unsigned long dirty_ratelimit; - unsigned long pos_ratio; struct backing_dev_info *bdi = wb->bdi; bool strictlimit = bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT; unsigned long start_time = jiffies; @@ -1433,6 +1437,9 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping, dirty_exceeded = (gdtc->wb_dirty > gdtc->wb_thresh) && ((gdtc->dirty > gdtc->thresh) || strictlimit); + + wb_position_ratio(gdtc); + if (dirty_exceeded && !wb->dirty_exceeded) wb->dirty_exceeded = 1; @@ -1444,8 +1451,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping, } dirty_ratelimit = wb->dirty_ratelimit; - pos_ratio = wb_position_ratio(gdtc); - task_ratelimit = ((u64)dirty_ratelimit * pos_ratio) >> + task_ratelimit = ((u64)dirty_ratelimit * gdtc->pos_ratio) >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT; max_pause = wb_max_pause(wb, gdtc->wb_dirty); min_pause = wb_min_pause(wb, max_pause, -- 2.1.0 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com (mail-qc0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256F9828FD for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 01:08:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by qcay5 with SMTP id y5so46457277qca.1 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w195si11196583qkw.99.2015.03.22.22.08.07 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qcto4 with SMTP id o4so136806869qct.3 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:08:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Tejun Heo Subject: [PATCH 08/18] writeback: add dirty_throttle_control->pos_ratio Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 01:07:37 -0400 Message-Id: <1427087267-16592-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1427087267-16592-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> References: <1427087267-16592-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: axboe@kernel.dk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@suse.cz, clm@fb.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com, david@fromorbit.com, gthelen@google.com, Tejun Heo wb_position_ratio() is used to calculate pos_ratio, which is used for two purposes. wb_update_dirty_ratelimit() uses it to adjust wb->[balanced_]dirty_ratelimit gradually and balance_dirty_pages() to immediately adjust dirty_ratelimit right before applying it to determine pause duration. While wb_update_dirty_ratelimit() is separately rate limited from balance_dirty_pages(), on the run where the ratelimit is updated, we end up calculating pos_ratio twice with the same parameters. This patch adds dirty_throttle_control->pos_ratio. balance_dirty_pages() calculates it once per run and wb_update_dirty_ratelimit() uses the value stored in dirty_throttle_control. This removes the duplicate calculation and also will help implementing memcg wb_domain. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Jens Axboe Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Wu Fengguang Cc: Greg Thelen --- mm/page-writeback.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index a4b6dab..ac2d7b1 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ struct dirty_throttle_control { unsigned long wb_dirty; /* per-wb counterparts */ unsigned long wb_thresh; unsigned long wb_bg_thresh; + + unsigned long pos_ratio; }; #define GDTC_INIT(__wb) .wb = (__wb) @@ -717,7 +719,7 @@ static long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint, * card's wb_dirty may rush to many times higher than wb_setpoint. * - the wb dirty thresh drops quickly due to change of JBOD workload */ -static unsigned long wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc) +static void wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc) { struct bdi_writeback *wb = dtc->wb; unsigned long write_bw = wb->avg_write_bandwidth; @@ -731,8 +733,10 @@ static unsigned long wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc) long long pos_ratio; /* for scaling up/down the rate limit */ long x; + dtc->pos_ratio = 0; + if (unlikely(dtc->dirty >= limit)) - return 0; + return; /* * global setpoint @@ -770,18 +774,20 @@ static unsigned long wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc) if (unlikely(wb->bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT)) { long long wb_pos_ratio; - if (dtc->wb_dirty < 8) - return min_t(long long, pos_ratio * 2, - 2 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT); + if (dtc->wb_dirty < 8) { + dtc->pos_ratio = min_t(long long, pos_ratio * 2, + 2 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT); + return; + } if (dtc->wb_dirty >= wb_thresh) - return 0; + return; wb_setpoint = dirty_freerun_ceiling(wb_thresh, dtc->wb_bg_thresh); if (wb_setpoint == 0 || wb_setpoint == wb_thresh) - return 0; + return; wb_pos_ratio = pos_ratio_polynom(wb_setpoint, dtc->wb_dirty, wb_thresh); @@ -807,7 +813,8 @@ static unsigned long wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc) * is 2. We might want to tweak this if we observe the control * system is too slow to adapt. */ - return min(pos_ratio, wb_pos_ratio); + dtc->pos_ratio = min(pos_ratio, wb_pos_ratio); + return; } /* @@ -888,7 +895,7 @@ static unsigned long wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc) pos_ratio *= 8; } - return pos_ratio; + dtc->pos_ratio = pos_ratio; } static void wb_update_write_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb, @@ -1009,7 +1016,6 @@ static void wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc, unsigned long dirty_rate; unsigned long task_ratelimit; unsigned long balanced_dirty_ratelimit; - unsigned long pos_ratio; unsigned long step; unsigned long x; @@ -1019,12 +1025,11 @@ static void wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc, */ dirty_rate = (dirtied - wb->dirtied_stamp) * HZ / elapsed; - pos_ratio = wb_position_ratio(dtc); /* * task_ratelimit reflects each dd's dirty rate for the past 200ms. */ task_ratelimit = (u64)dirty_ratelimit * - pos_ratio >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT; + dtc->pos_ratio >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT; task_ratelimit++; /* it helps rampup dirty_ratelimit from tiny values */ /* @@ -1375,7 +1380,6 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping, bool dirty_exceeded = false; unsigned long task_ratelimit; unsigned long dirty_ratelimit; - unsigned long pos_ratio; struct backing_dev_info *bdi = wb->bdi; bool strictlimit = bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT; unsigned long start_time = jiffies; @@ -1433,6 +1437,9 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping, dirty_exceeded = (gdtc->wb_dirty > gdtc->wb_thresh) && ((gdtc->dirty > gdtc->thresh) || strictlimit); + + wb_position_ratio(gdtc); + if (dirty_exceeded && !wb->dirty_exceeded) wb->dirty_exceeded = 1; @@ -1444,8 +1451,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping, } dirty_ratelimit = wb->dirty_ratelimit; - pos_ratio = wb_position_ratio(gdtc); - task_ratelimit = ((u64)dirty_ratelimit * pos_ratio) >> + task_ratelimit = ((u64)dirty_ratelimit * gdtc->pos_ratio) >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT; max_pause = wb_max_pause(wb, gdtc->wb_dirty); min_pause = wb_min_pause(wb, max_pause, -- 2.1.0 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org