From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Brodkin Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 07:49:24 +0000 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] uclibc: clean-up test suite build command In-Reply-To: <20140630200719.1339a6ed@free-electrons.com> References: <1404149181-18586-1-git-send-email-abrodkin@synopsys.com> <20140630200719.1339a6ed@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <1427269764.2718.4.camel@synopsys.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Thomas, On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 20:07 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Alexey Brodkin, > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 21:26:21 +0400, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > > Starting from uClibc 0.9.32 this cleaned-up command builds tests flawlessly. > > For 0.9.31 it lead to build failure, but assuming there're close to zero > > users who is going to test outdated uClibc library on obsolete > > (in Buildroot) AVR32 architecture I thin it worth applying. > > > > Still it's possible to have 2 variants at the same time until AVR32 is not gone: > > 1. Old implementation used strictly for uClibc 0.9.31 > > 2. New implementation for all other versions > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin > > Unfortunately, unless this cleaned-up version brings significant > benefits, I believe the best option is to keep things as is until AVR32 > support is really deprecated and removed from Buildroot, so that we can > drop support for 0.9.31. Now when AVR32 support is finally dropped do you think this patch might be accepted? It still applies flawlessly on current master. I build tested it on ARC and ARM. Note on ARM uClibc tests (BR2_UCLIBC_INSTALL_TEST_SUITE) will be only compiled without errors with uClibc-ng (BR2_UCLIBC_VERSION_NG), either BR2_UCLIBC_VERSION_0_9_33 or BR2_UCLIBC_VERSION_SNAPSHOT will fail on testsuite compilation but that has nothing to do with current patch. -Alexey