From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ycm2k-0001mG-OX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 22:36:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ycm2g-0008C2-9B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 22:36:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45423) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ycm2g-0008Bw-4N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 22:36:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:36:26 +0800 From: Jason Wang Message-Id: <1427769386.11302.3@smtp.corp.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150320123333.54cb602d.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> References: <1426671309-13645-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <1426671309-13645-11-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <20150320123333.54cb602d.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 10/19] virtio-ccw: introduce ccw specific queue limit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cornelia Huck Cc: Alexander Graf , Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christian Borntraeger , mst@redhat.com On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:35:00 +0800 > Jason Wang wrote: > >> Instead of depending on marco, using a bus specific limit. > > You should probably also mention the adapter routes change in your > changelog: > > "Also make it clear that the number of gsis per I/O adapter is not > directly depending on the number of virtio queues, but rather the > other > way around." Will add this in next version. > >> >> Cc: Alexander Graf >> Cc: Cornelia Huck >> Cc: Christian Borntraeger >> Cc: Richard Henderson >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang >> --- >> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 7 +++++-- >> hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- >> include/hw/s390x/s390_flic.h | 4 +++- >> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> > > Looks good to me. Thanks