From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier Matz Subject: [PATCH v3 2/5] mbuf: allow to clone an indirect mbuf Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:23:01 +0200 Message-ID: <1427829784-12323-3-git-send-email-zer0@droids-corp.org> References: <1427385595-15011-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <1427829784-12323-1-git-send-email-zer0@droids-corp.org> To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1427829784-12323-1-git-send-email-zer0-RqaWXwjnwG4BE+pwOMkbTQ@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" From: Olivier Matz Remove one limitation of rte_pktmbuf_attach(): "mbuf we're attaching to must be direct". Now, when we attach to an indirect mbuf: - copy the all relevant fields (addr, len, offload, ...) as before - get the pointer to the mbuf that embeds the data buffer (direct mbuf), and increase the reference counter of this one. When detaching the mbuf, we can retrieve this direct mbuf as the pointer is determined from the buffer address. Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz --- lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h index 932fe58..ca6be88 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h @@ -725,44 +725,50 @@ static inline struct rte_mbuf *rte_pktmbuf_alloc(struct rte_mempool *mp) * After attachment we refer the mbuf we attached as 'indirect', * while mbuf we attached to as 'direct'. * Right now, not supported: - * - attachment to indirect mbuf (e.g. - md has to be direct). * - attachment for already indirect mbuf (e.g. - mi has to be direct). * - mbuf we trying to attach (mi) is used by someone else * e.g. it's reference counter is greater then 1. * * @param mi * The indirect packet mbuf. - * @param md - * The direct packet mbuf. + * @param m + * The packet mbuf we're attaching to. */ -static inline void rte_pktmbuf_attach(struct rte_mbuf *mi, struct rte_mbuf *md) +static inline void rte_pktmbuf_attach(struct rte_mbuf *mi, struct rte_mbuf *m) { - RTE_MBUF_ASSERT(RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(md) && - RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(mi) && + struct rte_mbuf *md; + + RTE_MBUF_ASSERT(RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(mi) && rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mi) == 1); + /* if m is not direct, get the mbuf that embeds the data */ + if (RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m)) + md = m; + else + md = rte_mbuf_from_indirect(m); + rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(md, 1); - mi->buf_physaddr = md->buf_physaddr; - mi->buf_addr = md->buf_addr; - mi->buf_len = md->buf_len; - mi->priv_size = md->priv_size; - - mi->next = md->next; - mi->data_off = md->data_off; - mi->data_len = md->data_len; - mi->port = md->port; - mi->vlan_tci = md->vlan_tci; - mi->tx_offload = md->tx_offload; - mi->hash = md->hash; + mi->buf_physaddr = m->buf_physaddr; + mi->buf_addr = m->buf_addr; + mi->buf_len = m->buf_len; + mi->priv_size = m->priv_size; + + mi->next = m->next; + mi->data_off = m->data_off; + mi->data_len = m->data_len; + mi->port = m->port; + mi->vlan_tci = m->vlan_tci; + mi->tx_offload = m->tx_offload; + mi->hash = m->hash; mi->next = NULL; mi->pkt_len = mi->data_len; mi->nb_segs = 1; - mi->ol_flags = md->ol_flags | IND_ATTACHED_MBUF; - mi->packet_type = md->packet_type; + mi->ol_flags = m->ol_flags | IND_ATTACHED_MBUF; + mi->packet_type = m->packet_type; __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(mi, 1); - __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(md, 0); + __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 0); } /** -- 2.1.4